Re: [osol-discuss] Re: technical (kernel?) discussion list progress?

2006-04-25 Thread Joerg Schilling
Martin Schaffstall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mailing list names should be descriptive and consists of more than one word. Famous examples for bad list names include The question was whether this hackers list would really be limited to the kernel as LKML is or whether it

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: technical (kernel?) discussion list progress?

2006-04-18 Thread Eric Lowe
To specifically address your question: Also, the project seems to have mixed together the idea of a discussion, virtual memory changes, and a library. Wouldn't it make more sense to have a library project which is separate, and a VM project which is also separate? The muskoka project is

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: technical (kernel?) discussion list progress?

2006-04-17 Thread Dan Price
On Tue 11 Apr 2006 at 03:02PM, Nils Nieuwejaar wrote: Peter Buckingham wrote: There was some discussion about having a more technical mailing list/community ala freebsd hackers/lkml/... Was there any progress made on that? I'm definitely interested in discoverying/learning more

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: technical (kernel?) discussion list progress?

2006-04-17 Thread Rich Teer
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Dan Price wrote: Naming a mailing list filled with technical kernel content after an obscure lake in Canada seems maximally confusing to me, and would seem to make As opposed to naming it after an obscure state in the US? ;-) Joking aside, I agree that mailing list

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: technical (kernel?) discussion list progress?

2006-04-17 Thread Martin Schaffstall
On 4/18/06, Rich Teer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Dan Price wrote: Naming a mailing list filled with technical kernel content after an obscure lake in Canada seems maximally confusing to me, and would seem to make As opposed to naming it after an obscure state in the US?

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: technical (kernel?) discussion list progress?

2006-04-17 Thread Bart Smaalders
Martin Schaffstall wrote: Obvious choice would be SKML, the Solaris Kernel Mailing List. That works, and seems somehow familiar. We've always (well, for the 17+ years I've been here) had a kernel mailing list. We could put your idea in first normal form and have [EMAIL PROTECTED] There

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: technical (kernel?) discussion list progress?

2006-04-17 Thread Dan Price
On Mon 17 Apr 2006 at 04:55PM, Bart Smaalders wrote: Martin Schaffstall wrote: Obvious choice would be SKML, the Solaris Kernel Mailing List. That works, and seems somehow familiar. We've always (well, for the 17+ years I've been here) had a kernel mailing list. We could put your idea

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: technical (kernel?) discussion list progress?

2006-04-17 Thread David J. Orman
to the name. Cheers, David - Original Message - From: Dan Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Monday, April 17, 2006 2:04 pm Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Re: technical (kernel?) discussion list progress? On Mon 17 Apr 2006 at 04:55PM, Bart Smaalders wrote: Martin Schaffstall wrote: Obvious

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: technical (kernel?) discussion list progress?

2006-04-17 Thread Martin Schaffstall
On 4/18/06, Bart Smaalders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Martin Schaffstall wrote: Obvious choice would be SKML, the Solaris Kernel Mailing List. That works, and seems somehow familiar. We've always (well, for the 17+ years I've been here) had a kernel mailing list. We could put your idea in