Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > Good morning!
> > Just saw
> > https://www.redhat.com/archives/nahant-list/2006-March/msg00049.html
> > - Red Hat now supports 64 cpus on AMD64, Sun only 21. Why is Sun
> > lagging behind so much?
>
> I thought the maximum number of AMD64 CPUs is 8.
> As long as there a
"Felix Schulte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good morning!
> Just saw https://www.redhat.com/archives/nahant-list/2006-March/msg00049.html
> - Red Hat now supports 64 cpus on AMD64, Sun only 21. Why is Sun
> lagging behind so much?
I thought the maximum number of AMD64 CPUs is 8.
As long as there
Hi Felix,
> > I remember the discussion very good. I am complaining that Red Hat is
> > the technology leader now. Sun had half a year to deal with the
> > problem. Why is it so difficult to change the number from 21 to 64 as
> > proposed in the previous discussion?
>
> Fair enough. I had a look
Gavin Maltby wrote:
On 03/14/06 12:51, Felix Schulte wrote:
When do you put the code back?
I'm not working on it.
You seem to be a bit short on memory here :-)
No
I remember the discussion very good. I am complaining that Red Hat is
the technology leader now. Sun had half a year to dea
Felix Schulte wrote:
Good morning!
Just saw https://www.redhat.com/archives/nahant-list/2006-March/msg00049.html
- Red Hat now supports 64 cpus on AMD64, Sun only 21. Why is Sun
lagging behind so much?
We're testing these fixes now.
Which amd64 machine are you having trouble booting because we
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Gavin Maltby wrote:
> You seem to be a bit short on memory here :-) See the discussion of
> 24 Aug last year "Why is Solaris x86 limited to 21 CPUs?" and
> "NCPU madness - which Sun product supports 558 CPUs?" - both threads
> started by one Felix Schulte.
Touche!
--
Rich
On 03/14/06 12:51, Felix Schulte wrote:
When do you put the code back?
I'm not working on it.
You seem to be a bit short on memory here :-)
No
I remember the discussion very good. I am complaining that Red Hat is
the technology leader now. Sun had half a year to deal with the
problem. W
On 3/14/06, Gavin Maltby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 03/14/06 12:19, Felix Schulte wrote:
> > Good morning!
> > Just saw
> > https://www.redhat.com/archives/nahant-list/2006-March/msg00049.html
> > - Red Hat now supports 64 cpus on AMD64, Sun only 21. Why is Sun
> > lagging behind so much?
>
>
On 03/14/06 12:19, Felix Schulte wrote:
Good morning!
Just saw https://www.redhat.com/archives/nahant-list/2006-March/msg00049.html
- Red Hat now supports 64 cpus on AMD64, Sun only 21. Why is Sun
lagging behind so much?
There has been some work to address this (and we have appropriate test
equ
Good morning!
Just saw https://www.redhat.com/archives/nahant-list/2006-March/msg00049.html
- Red Hat now supports 64 cpus on AMD64, Sun only 21. Why is Sun
lagging behind so much?
--
_Felix Schulte
_|_|_ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(0 0)
ooO--(_)--Ooo
___
10 matches
Mail list logo
