http://www.heise.de/newsticker/Geht-Suns-Hardware-Sparte-doch-noch-an-HP--/meldung/144474
http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/08/27/oracle-could-deal-sun-hardware-to-hp/
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
j...@cs.tu-berlin.d
Jörg :
Don't lower yourself to this, please.
I can not read the German article nor do I care to waste my time on the
translation. The english article is probably the same sort of content.
Where it reveals this stunning observation :
"Since then, though, Ellison has said that he inte
http://www.oracle.com/features/sunoraclefaster.html
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@sun.com
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 1:01 AM, Alan
Coopersmith wrote:
> http://www.oracle.com/features/sunoraclefaster.html
>
> --
> -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@sun.com
> Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
Boo!!!
LLS!
(LongLiveSPARC!!!)
:
%martin
__
I dont like TPC-C. Why? SUN has before said that TPC-Cs are pointless and
meaningless. IBMs fastest server is a 17 million USD machine with 2TB RAM. I
thought SUN was above those artificial benches. Maybe Oracle is not?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Orvar Korvar wrote:
I dont like TPC-C. Why? SUN has before said that TPC-Cs are pointless and
meaningless. IBMs fastest server is a 17 million USD machine with 2TB RAM. I
thought SUN was above those artificial benches. Maybe Oracle is not?
But what Sun needs is lots of marketing and publicit
> Orvar Korvar wrote:
> > I dont like TPC-C. Why? SUN has before said that
> TPC-Cs are pointless and meaningless. IBMs fastest server is
> a 17 million USD machine with 2TB RAM. I thought SUN was
> above those artificial benches. Maybe Oracle is not?
> >
> But what Sun needs is lots of marketin
