[osol-discuss] b134b / 2010.05

Have a look at : http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/b134b/ http://cr.opensolaris.org/~gman/opensolaris-whats-new-2010-05/ -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] b134b / 2010.05

and what about the http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/20100508/ dir ;) Something might be cooking? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] b134b / 2010.05

It is consolidation from May 8th this year - not OSOL 2010.05.Certainly something is cooking but not at this place :). Uros > Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 02:49:15 -0700 > From: wporteg...@gmail.com > To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org > Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] b134b / 2010

Re: [osol-discuss] b134b / 2010.05

Nice to see that Whats new in OpenSolaris 2010.05 details below http://cr.opensolaris.org/~gman/opensolaris-whats-new-2010-05/ A couple of points with the "What's new" [i]"With this new functionality, users are still limited to a single OpenSolaris partition, whether it is primary or logic

Re: [osol-discuss] b134b / 2010.05

On 05/19/10 02:37 PM, russell wrote: Nice to see that Whats new in OpenSolaris 2010.05 details below http://cr.opensolaris.org/~gman/opensolaris-whats-new-2010-05/ A couple of points with the "What's new" what is surprising is the inclusion of CDE chunks: cde/calendar-manager-server

Re: [osol-discuss] b134b / 2010.05

On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 15:04 +0200, solarg wrote: > On 05/19/10 02:37 PM, russell wrote: > > > > Nice to see that Whats new in OpenSolaris 2010.05 details below > > > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~gman/opensolaris-whats-new-2010-05/ > > > > A couple of points with the "What's new" > > > > what i

Re: [osol-discuss] b134b / 2010.05

>Sadly no OpenVPN! Yes, some kind of VPN client please! Hope developers are listening... -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] b134b / 2010.05

There is download link for 2010.05, but it is pointing to 2009.06. When new opensolaris will be ready to download ? Ashish Nabira Enterprise IT Architect Sun Microsystems, Inc. 7th floor , Prestige Obelisk, Kasturba Rd Bangalore, KN 560025 IN Phone x89854/+91 8066930 854 Mobile +919845082183

Re: [osol-discuss] b134b / 2010.05

--- On Wed, 5/19/10, Ashish Nabira wrote: > There is download link for 2010.05, > but it is pointing to 2009.06. When new opensolaris will be > ready to download ? > > Ashish Nabira > Enterprise IT Architect > > Sun Microsystems, Inc. You'll see the announcement in opensolaris-announce for the O

Re: [osol-discuss] b134b / 2010.05

solarg wrote: > what is surprising is the inclusion of CDE chunks: > cde/calendar-manager-serverCDE calendar manager service daemon > cde/cde-utilitiesCDE Utilities > cde/help-viewerCDE Help Runtime Those are portions of CDE that were purposely excluded from the

Re: [osol-discuss] b134b / 2010.05

On 19 May 2010, at 14:04, solarg wrote: > > i'd also prefer to see Qt libs, and the possibility to switch user in gnome, > as in other distros... Re user switching, you used to be able to enable it as follows -- don't know if this still works, though:

Re: [osol-discuss] b134b / 2010.05

On 05/19/10 07:33 PM, Calum Benson wrote: On 19 May 2010, at 14:04, solarg wrote: i'd also prefer to see Qt libs, and the possibility to switch user in gnome, as in other distros... Re user switching, you used to be able to enable it as follows -- don't know if this still works, though: <

Re: [osol-discuss] b134b / 2010.05

On 19 May 2010, at 19:31, solarg wrote: > that's the point, it doesn't work! instead, it just launches the screensaver > ... > i don't understand why, if gnome is the same for linux distros and > opensolaris? and does it manage the sound when you switch user? User switching depends on a lot of

Re: [osol-discuss] b134b / 2010.05

> [i]TPM support for OpenSolaris[/i] > > Does this open the way for applications to be > provided for OpenSolaris which are license enforced > using the TPM chip? > If you wanted to write such an app you could. A TPM is not designed as a "license enforcing" device, though. The driver and sof

Re: [osol-discuss] b134b / 2010.05

The pages are gone. I guess they really want use to look at Genunix.org -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org