That's all you needed to supply.
The CR was closed by renaud.ma...@sun.com, who noted
in the evaluation
that vold is gone, Tamarack replaced it, and that
Tamarack *does*
handle ZFS storage pools.
The CR was then updated by artem.kachitch...@sun.com,
who noted that
Tamarack did do
Why is it though that it appears many gnu tools have
been adopted for
Opensolaris? Is it just to try to make a transition
for linux users a
little less painful or something to do with
licensing?
Somehow someone at Sun figured that they wanted to woo all the Linux developers
over to
I have had different experiences than you in this
respect.
All I was trying to say is that they have excellent ideas, but the
implementation has traditionally fallen short. Case in point is Java, write
once run anywhere is a grand idea, but the complex language and lack of a
compiler make
actually, this is two-sided coin. Sun Studio supports
less architectures
and less languages than gcc.
I was writing about the compiler himself, not the front end 'cc'.
Yes, what you write is true; but let's face it, any high-performance or system
stuff will be written either in C or
UNIX admin wrote:
And the GNU tools are mostly inferior products in
terms of
performance: for example, GNU AWK is slower than
System V AWK (this
has been chewed into oblivion on the Usenet); or
There's an interesting tradeoff with GNU awk though;
back in '03, I'd run into problems
UNIX admin writes:
Or volume management, which to this day doesn't work correctly (one can't
create a zpool on a removable device, then eject (zpool export) and plug that
device somewhere else and have it instantly imported by vold(1M).
And if you're interested, the RFE for this was closed
UNIX admin wrote:
And the GNU tools are mostly inferior products in terms of
performance: for example, GNU AWK is slower than System V AWK (this
has been chewed into oblivion on the Usenet); or GCC generates slower
code than any vendor's compilers (Sun Studio will trod GCC into the
ground in
UNIX admin tripivc...@hotmail.com
writes:
And let's not forget bash: a broken we know better replacement for
Korn and Bourne shells.
Don't mean to keep pounding here but you didn't really give a specific
example of this brokenness. I'm not sharp enough to just `get' what
you are driving at.
UNIX admin tripivc...@hotmail.com
writes:
And let's not forget bash: a broken we know better replacement for
Korn and Bourne shells.
Don't mean to keep pounding here but you didn't really give a specific
example of this brokenness. I'm not sharp enough to just `get' what
you are driving at.
When saying something like that, it helps quite a lot of you can cite
the actual CR number so that others can help either rescue the CR (if
it's in need of rescue) or provide a more comprehensive explanation.
The CR is 681661
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6811661
In this
a b writes:
When saying something like that, it helps quite a lot of you can cite
the actual CR number so that others can help either rescue the CR (if
it's in need of rescue) or provide a more comprehensive explanation.
The CR is 681661
ux-admin said:
Excellent engineers, excellent engineering practices and processes, but NEVER
a product that works 100%, with all kinks worked out.
Always phenomenal ideas, but never a 100% working product. About 75%, give or
take, is what gets released.
I have had different experiences than
That tinkering lead me to tryout a free OS being
offered by Solaris.
As I recall it cost something like $40 to try it out.
The OS was free
ut you paid for the processed CDs.
I still remember when I finally got it to boot up
that I thought it
was really cool to see the Sun logo pop up on
Knowing your SunID it would take 5 minutes. Bugster supports reported
email as search criterion.
roland wrote:
i added a bugreport to bugster for this yesterday. unfortunately, i dumped the response mail with the bug-id and now i cannot find my own bugreport anymore.
(did somebody delete
[corrected top-post]
Alexander Vlasov writes:
roland wrote:
i added a bugreport to bugster for this yesterday. unfortunately, i dumped
the response mail with the bug-id and now i cannot find my own bugreport
anymore.
(did somebody delete that?)
as this thread is linked from the
thanks - i can see it now and finding it by the search phrase, where i got no
hit before. seems i was a little bit too impatient. i should better read what`s
on screen. sorry for have taken your time !
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
UNIX admin tripivc...@hotmail.com
writes:
GNU userland is just garbage, unfortunately most casual users aren't even
aware just how shoddy and crappy GNU userland is.
First, your posts have been good reading...
About the gnu garbage... I see that attitude is common amongst long
time Solaris
I'm using what would pass as junk hardware to many
here. Its older
hardware and cheapo cards... but I've had to use PCI
sata cards
because OSOL does not recognize my onboard sata
controller.
Believe me when I write that I completely understand your frustration, simply
because it is my
UNIX admin tripivc...@hotmail.com
writes:
I'm using what would pass as junk hardware to many here. Its older
hardware and cheapo cards... but I've had to use PCI sata cards
because OSOL does not recognize my onboard sata controller.
Believe me when I write that I completely understand your
i added a bugreport to bugster for this yesterday. unfortunately, i dumped the
response mail with the bug-id and now i cannot find my own bugreport anymore.
(did somebody delete that?)
as this thread is linked from the bugster bugreport, whoever is reading this
thread please post the bug id
Unless you have a chassis that's made for hot plugging, and have a sliding
caddy with physical latch on the front, and a red blinking light to identify
which is the failed disk, and unless you bought a name brand product like
Sun or Dell or HP ... I think you can count on *not* supporting hot
Unless you have a chassis that's made for hot plugging, and have a
sliding
caddy with physical latch on the front, and a red blinking light to
identify
which is the failed disk, and unless you bought a name brand product
like
Sun or Dell or HP ... I think you can count on *not* supporting
thanks for the hint - i thought sata would be always hot-pluggable.
i checked the specs for 3114 and they tell it supports hot-plug:
http://www.siliconimage.com/products/product.aspx?pid=28
Regardless of what the manual says - because I've seen so many times that
the manual says some hardware
sil3114 is, politely speaking, not the best piece of hardware I've ever
seen, however it supports hotplug.
Original Poster: can you please take a look at cfgadm? Seems like sil
believes disk is still there or gone mad, maybe it cam be solved by
switching it off or marking unconfigured.
Hans
Original Poster: can you please take a look at cfgadm? Seems like sil
believes disk is still there or gone mad, maybe it cam be solved by
switching it off or marking unconfigured.
i can take a look at the end of the week and will report.
anyway - how can this be solved by switching it of or
roland devz...@web.de writes:
Original Poster: can you please take a look at cfgadm? Seems like
sil believes disk is still there or gone mad, maybe it cam be solved
by switching it off or marking unconfigured.
i can take a look at the end of the week and will report. anyway -
how can this be
Like you, I'm thinking if I'm going to have that much trouble when
pulling a disk, its looking like a large blemish on the usability of
zfs for my NAS server.
At the moment, the OpenSolaris ZFS experience seems to be rather
hardware dependent. With Sun hardware, I haven't had any problems,
Harry Putnam wrote:
Like you, I'm thinking if I'm going to have that much trouble when
pulling a disk, its looking like a large blemish on the usability of
zfs for my NAS server.
I've just checked the archives and it seems like you've had quite a ride
already, sorry to hear that! Let's hope
Hans van der Made s...@ukemi.com
writes:
[...]
I don't know which components you've used, and if these parts work
fine in other people's systems, but your description does not breed
confidence in this particular card. Of course, there's also BIOS
settings, firmware, bus mastering problems,
Hans van der Made s...@ukemi.com
writes:
Harry Putnam wrote:
Like you, I'm thinking if I'm going to have that much trouble when
pulling a disk, its looking like a large blemish on the usability of
zfs for my NAS server.
I've just checked the archives and it seems like you've had quite a
thanks for the hint - i thought sata would be always hot-pluggable.
i checked the specs for 3114 and they tell it supports hot-plug:
http://www.siliconimage.com/products/product.aspx?pid=28
i think i will try how a raid mirror behaves with linux, just to see if there
is a difference.
roland
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Hans van der Made h...@ukemi.com
Gesendet: 28.03.09 00:15:53
An: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Betreff: Re: [osol-discuss] disconnecting hdd from zfs mirror hangs whole
system
roland wrote:
i`m using a sil3114 sata controller with a zfs
hello,
i`m using a sil3114 sata controller with a zfs configured as mirror. if i
disconnect one of the drives, the whole system stalls until i reconnect the
drive.
i cannot even login via network anymore.
this lasts at least for some minutes (don`t know if it cures itself after a
while),
roland wrote:
i`m using a sil3114 sata controller with a zfs configured as mirror. if i disconnect one of the drives, the whole system stalls until i reconnect the drive.
i cannot even login via network anymore.
Not all hardware is suitable for hot removal of devices, whether the
OS supports
34 matches
Mail list logo
