James Carlson wrote: > Ray Clark writes: > >> I have installed 127729-2 (and about 66 other patches), and now instead of >> saying "Invalid argument", it says "Operation Not Supported". I guess that >> is a better message, but I wish it were more specific. Not sure whether >> that is Linux' doing or Solaris. >> Changing the subject a bit, but it would be really handy if setfacl et al worked on ZFS filesystems. As far as I know the ACLs on ZFS are a true superset of the old POSIX draft ones supported by UFS, and could therefore be mapped. Is this not true ? The permissions mask stuff is a bit odd., I guess. Could not the old setfacl calls be translated to the new improved ACLs ? Is anyone looking at this ? Is this something I could look at if I can persuade my boss to give me some time ?
This, quotas, and backups are the reasons we're keeping UFS filesystems around. Thoughts ? Rob -- E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PHONE: +44 24 7652 3037 Rob McMahon, IT Services, Warwick University, Coventry, CV4 7AL, England _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
