John Plocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ian Murdock wrote:
> >> > And that would break... what, exactly?
>
> We don't know.
>
> We know it has the potential of breaking scripts that,
> for better or worse, parse the output of "/bin/df".
>
> It can (and has been) argued that those scripts are
> a
Ian Murdock wrote:
> And that would break... what, exactly?
We don't know.
We know it has the potential of breaking scripts that,
for better or worse, parse the output of "/bin/df".
It can (and has been) argued that those scripts are
already not portable to Linux, since the output is
differen
