Fwd: [osol-discuss] Re: Project Proposal - Simplified Solaris Device Naming (a.k.a Devname)

2006-06-06 Thread Dick Davies
On 02/06/06, James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: UNIX admin writes: One of the rare things I like is how Linux solved this: regardless of the networking HW, all interfaces are named eth[0-N], for example eth0, eth1, ... , ethN. Linux isn't the only one to do this. AIX, BSD, and other

Re: Fwd: [osol-discuss] Re: Project Proposal - Simplified Solaris Device Naming (a.k.a Devname)

2006-06-06 Thread James Carlson
Dick Davies writes: On 02/06/06, James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: UNIX admin writes: One of the rare things I like is how Linux solved this: regardless of the networking HW, all interfaces are named eth[0-N], for example eth0, eth1, ... , ethN. Linux isn't the only one to do

Re: Fwd: [osol-discuss] Re: Project Proposal - Simplified Solaris Device Naming (a.k.a Devname)

2006-06-06 Thread Darren J Moffat
James Carlson wrote: Dick Davies writes: On 02/06/06, James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: UNIX admin writes: One of the rare things I like is how Linux solved this: regardless of the networking HW, all interfaces are named eth[0-N], for example eth0, eth1, ... , ethN. Linux isn't the only