I pulled the latest source, while other stuff unchanged (onbld, on-closed,
ss12), and the build really passed! A subsequent Install also succeeded.
Thanks a lot for all the help!
On 6/20/07, Ian Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
joy get wrote:
> 'resync workspace' means downloading latest so
joy get wrote:
> 'resync workspace' means downloading latest source, close bin and
> onbld tools, right?
>
I'd try an hg pull first.
Ian
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
'resync workspace' means downloading latest source, close bin and onbld
tools, right?
On 6/20/07, Sherry Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The following problem have been fixed in recent bits, so if you resync
your workspace with onnv, it should work.
Sherry
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 04:28:28PM
The following problem have been fixed in recent bits, so if you resync
your workspace with onnv, it should work.
Sherry
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 04:28:28PM +0800, joy get wrote:
> here are the info from the nightly.log:
>
> "../common/ioctl.c", line 1349: warning: pointer expression or its operan
Interesting...
Since we have not officially switched to build with SS12, your best bet
at this point is with SS11. I will forward the errors you got to
engineers actively working on SS12 support. I will keep you posted.
Sherry
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 04:28:28PM +0800, joy get wrote:
> here are
here are the info from the nightly.log:
"../common/ioctl.c", line 1349: warning: pointer expression or its operand
do not point to the same object l_tio, result is undefined and non-portable
(E_BAD_VAR_ADDRESS_ARITH)
cc: acomp failed for ../common/ioctl.c
*** Error code 2
dmake: Warning: Command
You will need to look at nightly.log and see what exactly failed.
Sherry
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 03:54:41PM +0800, joy get wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion. I followed and rebuilt the source, now the errors
> are different, I just cited some info as below:
>
>
> Nightly distributed build
Thanks for the suggestion. I followed and rebuilt the source, now the errors
are different, I just cited some info as below:
Nightly distributed build started: Tue Jun 19 13:39:20 CST 2007
Nightly distributed build completed: Tue Jun 19 15:35:26 CST 2007
Total build t
> That's why I didn??t encounter such failure when using the default installed
> studio?
>
> Where to get such heads-up information?
Usually here
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/on/flag-days/
However I didn't find a heads-up addressing this particular compiler
option issue.
Sherry
scuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Can't build ON source
You need to add the following line to your environment file:
__SSNEXT=
See usr/src/Makefile.master line 111 for details.
The error was caused by a change in the accepted compiler option for
specifying address mode. With Stud
You need to add the following line to your environment file:
__SSNEXT=
See usr/src/Makefile.master line 111 for details.
The error was caused by a change in the accepted compiler option for
specifying address mode. With Studio 12 only -xmodel=kernel is
accepted, while with previous versions of t
joy get wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to build the b63, but failed with quite a lot build errors.
> One error info is like "Id: fatal: relocation error: R_AMD64_32: file
> ./debug64/unix.o: symbol header_kstat_update: value 0xfb861a60
> does not fit".
>
> The Solaris version on my system is
I just got a successful b63 build on snv_63. The default sun studio seems
working well.
Yours,
Allen
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joy get
Sent: 2007年6月19日 12:53
To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: [osol-discuss]
13 matches
Mail list logo