Re: [osol-discuss] Super-Smack on Solaris 10 SPARC

2006-09-08 Thread David Powell
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 11:20:13PM +0200, "Dhr, Markus ICC-H" wrote: > > I cannot figure out why it will be complaining for contract > > id (ctdid) header not present in /usr/include/sys/siginfo. > > > > Once again this is probably something really trivial and 101 > > but I can really use some i

RE: [osol-discuss] Super-Smack on Solaris 10 SPARC

2006-09-08 Thread Döhr, Markus ICC-H
> I cannot figure out why it will be complaining for contract > id (ctdid) header not present in /usr/include/sys/siginfo. > > Once again this is probably something really trivial and 101 > but I can really use some input. It's not complaining about the header not beeing there but ctid_t not de

Re: [osol-discuss] Super-Smack on Solaris 10 SPARC

2006-09-08 Thread James Carlson
Frank Mash writes: > /usr/include/sys/siginfo.h:259: error: 'ctid_t' is used as a type, but is not >defined as a type. > /usr/include/sys/siginfo.h:390: error: 'ctid_t' is used as a type, but is not >defined as a type. This looks like the usual gcc fixincludes issue. If you upgrade the sy