then what exactly does cds ban? if no clients? because as long as you only
use emerald or second life then you wont get banned by cds. if you start
dabbling on other clients you get banned. so what does cds ban if no
clients?
On Sun, 02 May 2010 19:01:19 -0300, Skills Hak
wrote:
> Um, ple
Tigro Spottystripes schrieb:
> AFAIK only LL (and someone intercepting network communications) knows
> what channel some client is using
Yes and no - it is also transmitted with the useragent of the build-in
webbrowser.
Armin
___
Policies and (un)subsc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
>From that chat log it seems the banning system in question (not CDS)
uses heuristics, it banned that person for using a rare client, unless
i've misunderstood what was said there.
On 2/5/2010 19:01, Skills Hak wrote:
> Um, please don't confuse this
Um, please don't confuse this incident with CDS which doesn't ban clients
arbitrarily, this seems to be about a similar system of a more
unscrupulous "competitor". There isn't even a copybot client with
Snowglobe 2.0.0
() (CommunityDeveloper) as base we are aware of, so not sure why
zFire Xue i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
AFAIK only LL (and someone intercepting network communications) knows
what channel some client is using
On 2/5/2010 18:42, Rob Nelson wrote:
> The only way to reliably detect a client is if the client sends an MD5
> hash of the executable to the log
The only way to reliably detect a client is if the client sends an MD5
hash of the executable to the login server, and that function was
removed ages ago from the login process due to ease of spoofing.
Requiring a unique login channel requires manual intervention to change
the login channel from t
as far as i can tell the detection is done by loading a url on the client.
the browser in the client loads the url which is a server side script that
rips apart the header of the post and searches for a certain part which
happens to be the name of the client. if the name of the client matches
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 06:53:49PM -0400, Glen Canaday wrote:
> Though WHY anyone wouldn't want to come HERE to talk about client
> detection is far beyond my grasp. That's like AVG not wanting to talk to
> Microsoft.
Probably because it's a moronic asshole, who is only
interested in making mon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
according to Skill LL knows how the system works and has not taken any
measures to prevent it, which indicates they are ok with it
On 1/5/2010 18:50, Bryon Ruxton wrote:
> Is that thing really exploiting a quicktime hack?
> I.e. Trying to protect Co
Thanks! :)
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Opensource Obscure wrote:
>
> I created some issues in PJIRA about Viewer 2:
>
> Viewer 2 problems meta-issue
> https://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-19310
> (I thought it already existed, but I couldn't find it)
>
> Viewer 2 Inventory problems meta-iss
I've compiled SG 1.4 on Windows XP SP2, first with VC 2005 Express
Edition and then with SP1 installed.
When I try to start the program, either from a link or from within VC,
I get an error:
This application has failed to start because the application
configuration is incorrect. Reinstalling the
My mistake. I was under the impression that anything not on the list
wasn't supposed to be able to get on agni. I must have read it wrong.
--GC
On 05/01/2010 09:50 PM, Maya Remblai wrote:
> Glen Canaday wrote:
>
>> [14:57] GC Continental: anything not on the TPV list as of yesterday
>> can't
I don't see why we have that instruction. If you've tested on multiple
versions, we'd love to know that. So yes, affects version can be
multi-selected. You should only check items that you actually have tested.
I'll ask someone to modify the text there.
Q
On May 1, 2010, at 8:43 AM, Op
There is a page specifically aimed at open sourced Viewer2 and Snowglobe2
all though it is only instructions for working with VS in a windows
environment but any way here is the link to that wiki page.
https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Viewer_2_Microsoft_Windows_Builds
From: opensource-dev-b
14 matches
Mail list logo
