As an epileptic, let me do say that the viewer has caused "auras" (sort
of a buzzing in my head that warns me of an impending seizure) and has
caused migraines, particularly due to the GL rendering area getting
"squashed" by the sidebar. It's also very disorienting to people.
On Wed, 2010-03-24
Not to disagree with the entirety of your rant, but this bit seems
completely off the wall.
On 2010-03-23, at 21:39, Jonathan Irvin wrote:
> Not to be rude, but if people are getting vertigo, epilepsy, etc.
> from SL...viewer 2.0 isn't going to make a difference. Viewer 1.23
> would have th
Not to be rude, but if people are getting vertigo, epilepsy, etc. from
SL...viewer 2.0 isn't going to make a difference. Viewer 1.23 would have
the same effect. Maybe not in your coveted sidebar, but it SL in general.
You know it, I know it, everyone knows it. This is common knowledge. LCD
moni
Ok, I was trying to be diplomatic, but now I'm going to be frank.
It disturbs me that LL is ignoring how dangerous the shifting behavior
of the sidebar and the blinking and winking of 2.0 is. Some people have
already had or come close to having seizures because of it, and people
without epileps
As I've said before, If you don't like it, fix it. The code is there so
think up something more useful and do it. Giving an example is a great
idea. I use the adobe suite often; however, the Lindens already have spent
plenty of money with a design company to get the look that they want.
Switchi
Bryon Ruxton wrote ..
> Could you please stop putting everything into that sidebar as the only way
> to access stuff.
Yah, it's just bad. Have a look at the Adobe Creative Suite UIs. You can hide
any single submenu or entry, you can mark each one with one of several colors,
you can move around
