Re: [opensource-dev] ParcelAccessListReply packets have no reliable end of list indication?

2010-04-21 Thread Dale Glass
В сообщении от Понедельник 19 апреля 2010 22:46:53 автор Joshua Bell написал: > I took a peek at the sim code that issues ParcelAccessListReply and > your analysis appears to be correct; there's a special case for > sending a null entry if there are no entries at all, otherwise the > data is just s

Re: [opensource-dev] ParcelAccessListReply packets have no reliable end of list indication?

2010-04-20 Thread Joshua Bell
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 7:15 AM, Argent Stonecutter wrote: > On 2010-04-19, at 19:42, Joshua Bell wrote: >> >> That's a completely different issue. The lower level transport >> protocol guarantees reliable delivery of certain types of messages - >> packets are ack'd and resent if missed. > > 1. Ar

Re: [opensource-dev] ParcelAccessListReply packets have no reliable end of list indication?

2010-04-20 Thread Argent Stonecutter
On 2010-04-19, at 19:42, Joshua Bell wrote: > That's a completely different issue. The lower level transport > protocol guarantees reliable delivery of certain types of messages - > packets are ack'd and resent if missed. 1. Are these messages actually being handled by that mechanism? 2. I have s

Re: [opensource-dev] ParcelAccessListReply packets have no reliable end of list indication?

2010-04-19 Thread Joshua Bell
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Argent Stonecutter wrote: > > Would that explain why the viewer sometimes appears to lose data (for > example, spurious missing inventory), because it's got no way of > knowing if some of the packets from the server were lost unless there > were later packets? If s

Re: [opensource-dev] ParcelAccessListReply packets have no reliable end of list indication?

2010-04-19 Thread Tigro Spottystripes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 i believe this is related: http://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-15563 "Client gives up before finishing to load full inventory due to packet loss" On 19/4/2010 21:07, Argent Stonecutter wrote: > > On 2010-04-19, at 13:46, Joshua Bell wrote: > >> It

Re: [opensource-dev] ParcelAccessListReply packets have no reliable end of list indication?

2010-04-19 Thread Argent Stonecutter
On 2010-04-19, at 13:46, Joshua Bell wrote: > It is certainly the case that several request/response-type messages > do not have a way of signaling that all of the data was sent. This > arose from thinking of the protocol in a purely viewer-centric way, > i.e. if the viewer was populating a list

Re: [opensource-dev] ParcelAccessListReply packets have no reliable end of list indication?

2010-04-19 Thread Joshua Bell
It is certainly the case that several request/response-type messages do not have a way of signaling that all of the data was sent. This arose from thinking of the protocol in a purely viewer-centric way, i.e. if the viewer was populating a list view, the data in additional packets is simply append

[opensource-dev] ParcelAccessListReply packets have no reliable end of list indication?

2010-04-18 Thread Dale Glass
Hi! I've run into an issue here: I'd like to reliably edit a parcel's banlist. However, it seems that ParcelAccessListReply has no way of indicating that the entire banlist has been delivered: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/ParcelAccessListReply The best way I came up with for now is that if t