Argent Stonecutter a écrit :
On 2010-08-19, at 04:09, Gareth Nelson wrote:
> None of those projects have an agreement that allows proprietary versions
I think Qt has LGPL and proprietary licensing now.
You're right :
http://qt.nokia.com/downloads
___
On 2010-08-19, at 04:09, Gareth Nelson wrote:
> None of those projects have an agreement that allows proprietary versions
I think Qt has LGPL and proprietary licensing now.
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife
None of those projects have an agreement that allows proprietary versions
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 4:12 AM, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence)
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Henri Beauchamp wrote:
>
> SL is the ONLY so-called (but actually still not, obviously: a Canada-Dry
> LGPL, perhaps ?)
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Henri Beauchamp wrote:
SL is the ONLY so-called (but actually still not, obviously: a Canada-Dry
LGPL, perhaps ?) LGPL Open Source project requiring a License agreement
from its contributors !!! This makes strictly no sense and is a clear
impairement.
Axiom
