---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/278/#review654
---
indra/llvfs/llvfs.cpp
On April 27, 2011, 3:30 a.m., Boroondas Gupte wrote:
indra/llvfs/llvfs.cpp, lines 1716-1717
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/278/diff/1/?file=1511#file1511line1716
When index_size == 0, wouldn't it be more appropriate to skip the steps
that require taking the address of element
On April 27, 2011, 3:30 a.m., Boroondas Gupte wrote:
indra/llvfs/llvfs.cpp, lines 1716-1717
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/278/diff/1/?file=1511#file1511line1716
When index_size == 0, wouldn't it be more appropriate to skip the steps
that require taking the address of element
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/278/#review661
---
Ship it!
Ready to rock!
- Boroondas
On April 26, 2011, 5:31
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/278/
---
Review request for Viewer.
Summary
---
Fix for a minor buffer overrun
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/278/#review652
---
Ship it!
hg rm llconfusingcode.cpp is better, but llmax() works
