On 2010-11-18, at 04:06, Opensource Obscure wrote:
> this is interesting - what exactly is your estimation based upon?
Stickman covered it pretty well. Basically, I was comparing concurrency with
the number of sims and assumed that a GPU cost about as much as a CPU core to
provide... but didn't
Featuring avatars with limited activities, Intel had this result:
http://www.open-simulator.com/2010/06/21/sciencesim-demos-1000-avatars-on-a-sim/
GCI
- Original Message -
From: "Dmitriy Kazimirov"
To:
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 2:32 PM
Subject: Re: [opensour
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 02:58:51 -0800, Stickman
wrote:
>> this is interesting - what exactly is your estimation based upon?
>
> I love estimating! :D Let me try.
:) thanks!
Also, I just found this today's news, and it seems in topic:
New EC2 Instance Type - The Cluster GPU Instance
http:
Even if does not support build - it should render.and that's most
expensive feature.
But may be LL wants to make cloud rendering Premium-only feature?
This will make Premium more important
2010/11/18 Garmin Kawaguichi :
> wrog?? :)))
>
> Note that one server can accept up to 40 avatars
>
> and the
wrog?? :)))
Note that one server can accept up to 40 avatars
and the avatars on a browser have reduced functionnalities eg no build
GCI
- Original Message -
From: "Stickman"
[...] then that puts the "maximum and minimum" count of LL server farm at
(3750 + 938) 4688 servers maximum an
> this is interesting - what exactly is your estimation based upon?
I love estimating! :D Let me try.
Conventional experience tells me that the SL viewer resource usage
consumes one CPU core and one GPU. It's possible that some specialty
client could be used on an "industrial strength" CUDA GPU,
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 03:59:24 -0600, Argent
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Daniel Smith
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 6:29 PM, wrote:
>>> the mail below is a copy of a msg i got from SL this afternoon. Is
>>> it
>>> some kinda sign that the viewer is in danger of going exti
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Daniel Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 6:29 PM, wrote:
>> the mail below is a copy of a msg i got from SL this afternoon. Is it
>> some kinda sign that the viewer is in danger of going extinct?
> No, it would just be yet another way to get to the same exp
Am Donnerstag 18 November 2010 schrieb Simon Quinnell:
> I heard a rumour that usernames must contain baka in them after Jan
> 1 to cater for the Japanese market :)
heh, if there was a jira for that i would vote for it.
___
Policies and (un)subscribe in
I heard a rumour that usernames must contain baka in them after Jan 1 to
cater for the Japanese market :)
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Daniel Smith wrote:
>
> I did hear a rumour that new usernames created after January 1 can only be
> made up of vowels and even numbers.
>
> Daniel
>
>
_
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 6:29 PM, wrote:
> Hey, Y'all,
>
> the mail below is a copy of a msg i got from SL this afternoon. Is it
> some kinda sign that the viewer is in danger of going extinct?
>
>
No, it would just be yet another way to get to the same experience. The key
audience would be: peo
Hey, Y'all,
the mail below is a copy of a msg i got from SL this afternoon. Is it
some kinda sign that the viewer is in danger of going extinct? i can't
tell you how much i wouldn't like it if my SL experience was doomed to be
boxed up in a browser! For real, i think i see a big deficit in the
12 matches
Mail list logo
