g a TPV version to the
> WIP before LL.
>
> IMO, it sucks.
>
> Nicky
>
>
> >
> >
> > From: Lance Corrimal
> >
> >To: opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com
> >Sent: Monday, September 3, 2012 2:54 AM
> >Sub
ing on a WIP
>feature and publishing a TPV version to the WIP before LL.
>
>
>IMO, it sucks.
>
>
>Nicky
>
>
>
>
>>
>> From: Lance Corrimal
>>To: opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com
>>Sent: Monday, Sep
rrimal
>To: opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com
>Sent: Monday, September 3, 2012 2:54 AM
>Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] what happened to posting codereview requests
>against viewer-development?
>
>Is there any particular reason why I still cannot file a CR against viewer-
>dev
Is there any particular reason why I still cannot file a CR against viewer-
development, even though the latest version of "the official policy" as posted
by Oz on this list roughly a week ago or two said that patches should be based
on viewer-development?
Am Mittwoch, 29. August 2012, 11:16:2
I'm trying to post a CR for a fix for VWR-29531, but I can't select viewer-
development as repository... which makes posting the CR meaningless, since the
bug has not moved into viewer-beta or viewer-release yet.
What's going on there?
bye,
LC
___
Po
