[Bug 3558] Spelling "yes" as "Yes" in sshd_config has a fatal result

2023-04-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3558 --- Comment #12 from Darren Tucker --- (In reply to Damien Miller from comment #11) > Maybe we could provide a "visudo" like tool to wrap config editing > in sshd -T? I like that even less than leaving it as is. -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 3558] Spelling "yes" as "Yes" in sshd_config has a fatal result

2023-04-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3558 --- Comment #11 from Damien Miller --- Sure, but the current behaviour has the benefit of being obvious and we do provide hooks to verify the config before reloading. Maybe we could provide a "visudo" like tool to wrap config editing in sshd

[Bug 3558] Spelling "yes" as "Yes" in sshd_config has a fatal result

2023-04-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3558 --- Comment #10 from Darren Tucker --- The message doesn't go to the user sending the SIGHUP now (unless you're arguing "when it stops working they'll eventually get the message"). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the

[Bug 3558] Spelling "yes" as "Yes" in sshd_config has a fatal result

2023-04-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3558 --- Comment #9 from Damien Miller --- I don't like this because the message doesn't (can't) go to the user sending the SIGHUP, only the system log. So if the intended config change was really important (e.g. one with security consequences) but

[Bug 3558] Spelling "yes" as "Yes" in sshd_config has a fatal result

2023-04-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3558 Darren Tucker changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #3689||ok?(d...@mindrot.org)