https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2948
Damien Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #18 from Damien Miller
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2948
--- Comment #17 from Damien Miller ---
Closing bugs from openssh-9.1 release cycle
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2948
Mike Frysinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2948
--- Comment #15 from Mike Frysinger ---
had to rebase after expand-p...@openssh.com was added. i posted the
patches to the mailing list this time:
https://lists.mindrot.org/pipermail/openssh-unix-dev/2021-September/039670.html
--
You are receiv
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2948
Mike Frysinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #3345|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2948
Mike Frysinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #3344|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2948
--- Comment #12 from Mike Frysinger ---
thanks for the feedback. i'll take another pass at this once the
limits extension lands since they're touching a lot of the same code
and i don't feel like fighting rebase conflicts while review is
ongoing.
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2948
--- Comment #11 from Damien Miller ---
Comment on attachment 3344
--> https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=3344
sftp server copy-data extension
>+ /* Disallow reading & writing to the same handle */
>+ if (read_handle == wri
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2948
--- Comment #10 from Damien Miller ---
Comment on attachment 3345
--> https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=3345
sftp client copy-data extension
This too looks good, minor comments:
>diff --git a/sftp-client.c b/sftp-client.c
>index 4
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2948
--- Comment #9 from Damien Miller ---
Comment on attachment 3344
--> https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=3344
sftp server copy-data extension
looks good - some minor comments
>diff --git a/PROTOCOL b/PROTOCOL
>index f75c1c0ae5b0..04
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2948
--- Comment #8 from Mike Frysinger ---
(In reply to Darren Tucker from comment #3)
thx for the reviews.
> > [...] This avoids needing to
> >+download the data before uploading it across the network twice.
>
> Why uploading twice?
i was referri
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2948
--- Comment #7 from Darren Tucker ---
(In reply to Darren Tucker from comment #3)
[...]
> >+{ "copy-data", "copy-data", 0, process_extended_copy_data, 1 },
>
> This is a protocol violation. The server is implementing
> secsh-filexfer-02 whic
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2948
--- Comment #6 from Darren Tucker ---
Comment on attachment 3345
--> https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=3345
sftp client copy-data extension
[...]
>+.It Ic copy Ar oldpath Ar newpath
the man page says "copy" but the code says "cp".
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2948
--- Comment #5 from Darren Tucker ---
Created attachment 3345
--> https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=3345&action=edit
sftp client copy-data extension
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2948
Darren Tucker changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #3344|sftp copy-data extension|sftp server copy-data
description|
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2948
--- Comment #4 from Darren Tucker ---
(In reply to Darren Tucker from comment #3)
[..]
> That said I don't think we'd consider this without a client
> implementation since without that we can't test it.
ignore that comment, I see the followup pat
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2948
--- Comment #3 from Darren Tucker ---
Comment on attachment 3344
--> https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=3344
sftp copy-data extension
> [...] This avoids needing to
>+download the data before uploading it across the network twice.
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2948
Darren Tucker changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dtuc...@dtucker.net
--- Comment #2 from D
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2948
--- Comment #1 from Mike Frysinger ---
is there anything i can do to help move this forward ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
___
openssh-bugs mailing
19 matches
Mail list logo
