Re: -kb revisited

1998-12-31 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Thanks to Simon Middleton, I realised I got it wrong... cvs admin -kkv > _does_ reset the options, but you have to follow it with cvs update -A > to see the change. > Now someone needs to run around and reset everything that shouldn't be > -kb, and the

-kb revisited

1998-12-31 Thread Ben Laurie
Thanks to Simon Middleton, I realised I got it wrong... cvs admin -kkv _does_ reset the options, but you have to follow it with cvs update -A to see the change. Now someone needs to run around and reset everything that shouldn't be -kb, and then we all need to do an update -A. How did they get t

Re: Problem with pem.h

1998-12-31 Thread Ben Laurie
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > > After the recent changes the pem.h is gone, and the pem.org exists. But the > Configure script doesn't generate pem.h out of pem.org. Later things fail in > compilation? Either Configure should be fixed or pem.org renamed back to > pem.h, I think. Do we need pem.org

WTF?

1998-12-31 Thread Ben Laurie
It seems that many (perhaps all) files have -kb set on them - which prevents merging! I wondered what had happened to pk7_doit.c (which Stephen patched, but I had already made the same fix) - it seems it didn't get checked in because of this. Even stranger, setting cvs admin -kkv on the offending

Re: OpenSSL and SSL clients like SSLtelnet and SSLftp

1998-12-31 Thread Ben Hochstedler
Ralf, I think having apps that use OpenSSL hosted on the openssl site will be a great benefit to the community because it will hopefully further increase the visibility of OpenSSL & apps that use it. How would you handle giving the main owner of a app the administrative abilities to manage hi

Re: OpenSSL and SSL clients like SSLtelnet and SSLftp

1998-12-31 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Does the OpenSSL team also intend to adopt/coordinate the development > of the SSL client applications like SSLtelnet and SSLftp. Or are they > only interested in apache-ssl? > It would be a good idea to have some more people working on it and > using

Re: Problem with pem.h

1998-12-31 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: >> >> After the recent changes the pem.h is gone, and the pem.org exists. But the >> Configure script doesn't generate pem.h out of pem.org. Later things fail in >> compilation? Either Configure should be fixed or pem.org ren