Big batch of RedHat SRPMs

1999-05-10 Thread Mike Hardy
First, since I'm sending this to the developer contacts of a lot of packages I use - anyone who has contributed to any software on this page deserves a great big "thank you" from me. I work in PHP, and that means that I'm standing on the foundation of all that you've built. I really appreciate

ATTENTION: Code freeze proposed for today!!

1999-05-10 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
Friends, please let us remind now that we proposed the code freeze for OpenSSL 0.9.3 for today (see STATUS document) in order to be able to kick out the release next week (Monday, May 17th). When you've large or compatibility-problematic changes in your queue, either decide to queue them for

CA Patches ( -update )

1999-05-10 Thread Massimiliano Pala
Hi all!! Someone some time ago posted it's proposal for the -update flag to the ca tool. I'd like to contact him as I lost his message and I would like to implement it into OpenSSL. I ask him to send in some source code (if any) to not develop the same thing 2 times ... See you on the bit

Re: ATTENTION: Code freeze proposed for today!!

1999-05-10 Thread Bodo Moeller
On Mon, May 10, 1999 at 09:47:41AM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: Friends, please let us remind now that we proposed the code freeze for OpenSSL 0.9.3 for today (see STATUS document) Readers of openssl-cvs of course know that the STATUS document itself does not quite follow the freeze

Re: Patch for ca.c to check index.txt for expired certs

1999-05-10 Thread Massimiliano Pala
Lars Weber wrote: Dear OpenSSL-Devlopers ! As I have wrote in a mail to openssl-users I would like to add a new functionality in openssl. As Massimiliano Pala has suggested I send my patch to this list. I have attached a patch to enhance the "ca"-application to check "index.txt" for

Definitive patch to ca apps

1999-05-10 Thread Massimiliano Pala
Ok... I had to work some time on the code to get it working but it seems to be all ok, now.The new patch will add the -status and the -updatedb switches to the ca application. Please try to include the patch in the 0.9.3 version. See you on the bit Stream, Massimiliano Pala ([EMAIL

Definitive patch to ca apps (2)

1999-05-10 Thread Massimiliano Pala
Ok... I had to work some time on the code to get it working but it seems to be all ok, now.The new patch will add the -status and the -updatedb switches to the ca application. Please try to include the patch in the 0.9.3 version. See you on the bit Stream, Massimiliano Pala ([EMAIL

Re: [STATUS] OpenSSL (Sun 9-May-1999)

1999-05-10 Thread Andy Polyakov
RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS o Compilation warnings: ctype-related int vs. char --- shouldn't this be *last* in the list? o BSD/OS: assembler functions must not have leading underscores o exptest and rsa_oaep_test fail with irix64-* (Don Badrak

Re: ATTENTION: Code freeze proposed for today!!

1999-05-10 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: On Mon, May 10, 1999 at 09:47:41AM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: Friends, please let us remind now that we proposed the code freeze for OpenSSL 0.9.3 for today (see STATUS document) [...] I've not quite finished cleaning up the cert_st

Re: Patch for ca.c to check index.txt for expired certs

1999-05-10 Thread Lars Weber
On Mon, May 10, 1999 at 01:39:43PM +0200, Massimiliano Pala wrote: Hi Massimiliano ! Lars Weber wrote: I had to move the whole if(updatedb) ... to upper level actually avoiding the password request ( thus removing your if(updatedb = 0 ) on the certificate loading stage). I actually get

Re: ATTENTION: Code freeze proposed for today!!

1999-05-10 Thread Ben Laurie
Bodo Moeller wrote: I've not quite finished cleaning up the cert_st handling -- while I hope that the current code is significantly less broken than the one that was in the library until yesterday, the session-sess_cert stuff still is not too comprehensible, and thus I cannot claim to be sure

No Subject

1999-05-10 Thread Andrea e Luca Giacobazzi
Hi, I patched ssl_engine_kernel.c to realize an OCSP responder function that check cert status on ldap v2 directory. I send all my patch to ssl_engine_kernel.c, every routine start is marked with Giacob label. The ldap_hook search the certificate in our ldap directory, by client

No Subject

1999-05-10 Thread Andrea e Luca Giacobazzi
Hi, I patched ssl_engine_kernel.c to realize an OCSP responder function that check cert status on ldap v2 directory. I send all my patch to ssl_engine_kernel.c, every routine start is marked with Giacob label. The ldap_hook search the certificate in our ldap directory, by client

Re: ATTENTION: Code freeze proposed for today!!

1999-05-10 Thread Ben Laurie
Ulf Möller wrote: I'm also going to force the version number debate to a conclusion, even if I have to take unilateral action. I thought everybody agreed the release is going to be number 0.9.3? I'm talking about the format of the numerical version. Cheers, Ben. --

+xxx in Configure

1999-05-10 Thread Anonymous
Here's a patch to fix handling of +xxx args to Configure. Index: Configure === RCS file: /e/openssl/cvs/openssl/Configure,v retrieving revision 1.77 diff -u -r1.77 Configure --- Configure 1999/05/10 11:07:50 1.77 +++ Configure

x509v3 enum patch

1999-05-10 Thread ChangHee Lee
Hello guys, In v3_enum.c, there is not 's2i' function. So, we can't use CRLReason extension field in CRL. I patch v3_enu.c, x509v3.h to use crlreason. The following is config file format: CRLReason=keyCompromise - ChangHee Lee. Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Company: Initiative Technology

Dynamic libs for 0.9.3?

1999-05-10 Thread Damien Miller
Will the upcoming 0.9.3 release support building of dynamic libs "out-of-the-box"? Regards, Damien -- | "Bombay is 250ms from New York in the new world order" - Alan Cox | Damien Miller - http://www.ilogic.com.au/~dmiller | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) -or- [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work)

Re: Big batch of RedHat SRPMs

1999-05-10 Thread D. Hugh Redelmeier
[Sorry if this is inappropriate. I just subscribed to the OpenSSL lists, and this was the first message I read.] | From: Mike Hardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], Clay Ratliff [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL