openssl 0.9.3, debug-linux-elf
sj:apps# ./openssl ca -gencrl
Electric Fence 2.0.5 Copyright (C) 1987-1998 Bruce Perens.
Using configuration from /usr/local/ssl/openssl.cnf
-BEGIN X509 CRL-
MIIBDjCBuTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFADBgMQswCQYDVQQGEwJBVTEMMAoGA1UECBMD
UUxEMRkwFwYDVQQKExBNaW5jb20gUHR5
Hi,
Have you run
perl util\mkdef.pl crypto ssl update
when you got the error? look at Troubleshooting
part of INSTALL.W32, I have no problem with 0.9.3.
With Regards.
Zhigang
--- Per Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Arghh, I misspelled, here's the correct one:
>
> WRONG ==> perl md5-58
Hi,
Can ainyone tell me if there is an implemented cipher suite in
OpenSSL that uses DH/DSS authentication and key exchange?
Chad.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing Li
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 25 18:08:31 1999
Received: by en5.engelschall.com (Sendmail 8.9.2) via ESMTP for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
from bilbo.thawte.com id SAA28579; Tue, 25 May 1999 18:08:29 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from gorgon.tha
> -Original Message-
> From: Dr Stephen Henson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 1999 6:35 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: req_attributes
>
>
> Wu Zhigang wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > can an expert give me some ideas what is mean of a
> > req_attributes? Do I
I, also, would prefer 'global' header files to be in the 'global'
include directory.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 1999 6:18 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Header files ...
>
> On Tue, May 25, 1999 a
...or running the x86asm.sh which updates everything!
No problems after that.
Thanks!
Patrik
Per Nilsson wrote:
> **Blush** It was as simple as running the perl script in the asm directory.
>
> perl md5-586.pl win32 >md5-win32.asm
>
> Still, another small fix for 0.9.3a...
>
> /Per
>
> > -
In case anyone else has this problem, here's some help.
I had a problem building openssl-0.9.3 on the following machine config:
uname -m = i386
uname -s = BSD/OS
uname -r = 3.1
The compile bombed in crypto/sha/sha_dgst.c because the target machine (i386)
doesn't support
**Blush** It was as simple as running the perl script in the asm directory.
perl md5-586.pl win32 >md5-win32.asm
Still, another small fix for 0.9.3a...
/Per
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Patrik Carlsson
> Sent: Tuesday, May 25,
Arghh, I misspelled, here's the correct one:
WRONG ==> perl md5-586.pl win32 >md5-win32.asm
OK==> perl md5-586.pl win32 >m5-win32.asm
/Per
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Patrik Carlsson
> Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 1999 10:09 PM
>
I fixed it by changing the name of the exported function in the assembler
file
for md5 (asm/m5-win32.asm) to that name. This is supposed to be generated by
the magic (wow, is it magic...) perl assembler. I haven't dug into how to
run that, anybody ?
I guess this may qualify as a bug :-)
/Per Nil
> >>> - for (;;)
> >>> + for (;1;)
>
> >> Eh? Why?
>
> > Well, to be honest I don't really have a clear clue:-) It just works! I
> > suppose egcs-1.1.2 optimizer takes it easier on for(;1;) than on
> > for(;;)...
>
> Does while (1) also work?
Yes.
> Looks much saner ...
No comment:-
On Tue, May 25, 1999 at 06:39:50PM +0200, Andy Polyakov wrote:
>>> - for (;;)
>>> + for (;1;)
>> Eh? Why?
> Well, to be honest I don't really have a clear clue:-) It just works! I
> suppose egcs-1.1.2 optimizer takes it easier on for(;1;) than on
> for(;;)...
Does while (1) also wo
On Tue, May 25, 1999 at 02:46:54PM -0400, Salz, Rich wrote:
> Why are the header files copied over into the include directory?
> Seems like extra work to "make links" or whatever it is...
It's much less confusing to have the header files in the same
directory as the corresponding source code tha
I have some problems building openssl-0.9.3 on NT with ml enabled (i.e.
no-asm removed from
do_ms.bat).
I get the following when building:
1. perl Configure VC-WIN32 --> OK
2. ms\do_ms --> OK
3. nmake -f ms\ntdll.mak -->
...
cl /Fotmp32dll\c_zlib.obj -Iinc32 -Itmp32dll /MD /W3 /WX /G5
/O
Why are the header files copied over into the include directory?
Seems like extra work to "make links" or whatever it is...
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
Andy Polyakov wrote:
> How about following instead? Andy:-)
works fine with that patch.
-al.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROT
> could you apply this patch and try again?
sure:
82E8FF318CBABE4C37B8DD0B737D813D7F31F0A2061BBE34D10 * 2 -
105D1FE6319757C986F71BA16E6FB027AFE63E1440C377C69A20
105D1FE6319757C986F71BA16E6FB027AFE63E1440C377C69A20 * 2 -
20BA3FCC632EAF930DEE3742DCDF
> > > > on linux 2.2[.9] with egcs-1.1.2 and libc.5.4.46, the bignum test fails.
> > > > with "./Configure no-asm linux-elf", test/bntest results in the attached
> > > > output, which ends with "Left shift test failed!" the next test (exptest)
> > > > appears to be caught in a loop and doesn't act
Andy Polyakov wrote:
>
> > > on linux 2.2[.9] with egcs-1.1.2 and libc.5.4.46, the bignum test fails.
> > > with "./Configure no-asm linux-elf", test/bntest results in the attached
> > > output, which ends with "Left shift test failed!" the next test (exptest)
> > > appears to be caught in a loop
> > on linux 2.2[.9] with egcs-1.1.2 and libc.5.4.46, the bignum test fails.
> > with "./Configure no-asm linux-elf", test/bntest results in the attached
> > output, which ends with "Left shift test failed!" the next test (exptest)
> > appears to be caught in a loop and doesn't actually produce an
> on linux 2.2[.9] with egcs-1.1.2 and libc.5.4.46, the bignum test fails.
> with "./Configure no-asm linux-elf", test/bntest results in the attached
> output, which ends with "Left shift test failed!" the next test (exptest)
> appears to be caught in a loop and doesn't actually produce any output
Al Smith wrote:
>
> on linux 2.2[.9] with egcs-1.1.2 and libc.5.4.46, the bignum test fails.
> with "./Configure no-asm linux-elf", test/bntest results in the attached
> output, which ends with "Left shift test failed!" the next test (exptest)
> appears to be caught in a loop and doesn't actually
Wu Zhigang wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> can an expert give me some ideas what is mean of a
> req_attributes? Do I have to provide these when
> generate a req?
>
> [ req_attributes ]
> challengePassword = A challenge password
> challengePassword_min = 4
> challengePassword_max
on linux 2.2[.9] with egcs-1.1.2 and libc.5.4.46, the bignum test fails.
with "./Configure no-asm linux-elf", test/bntest results in the attached
output, which ends with "Left shift test failed!" the next test (exptest)
appears to be caught in a loop and doesn't actually produce any output at
all.
Wu Zhigang wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> can an expert give me some ideas what is mean of a
> req_attributes? Do I have to provide these when
> generate a req?
>
> [ req_attributes ]
> challengePassword = A challenge password
> challengePassword_min = 4
> challengePassword_max
Hi,
can an expert give me some ideas what is mean of a
req_attributes? Do I have to provide these when
generate a req?
[ req_attributes ]
challengePassword = A challenge password
challengePassword_min = 4
challengePassword_max = 20
unstructuredName
Gang Lu wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I tried to build a client and a server based on the example of cli.cpp
> and serv.cpp in openssl-0.9.2b. However, I always get the following
> erro message:
>
> 19296:error:1408A0C1:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_CLIENT_HELLO:no shared
> cipher:S3_srvr.c:759
>
> Could anyone
28 matches
Mail list logo
