Hi,
Thanks for your reply. It's a shame though that the option isn't build yet
in OpenSSL, since it will be too late for the project I'm working on (still
only one month left) to be incorporated. Still I would like it if it would
be build in OpenSSL, because I certainly intend to continue with Op
>Compiling 0.9.3 under NT4/egcs-1.1.2 including the test went fine
>after I changed line 6 in util/pl/mingw32f.pl to read
>$o='/';
util/pl/mingw32f.pl is used only to put files to their places using
the DOS utilities. util/pl/mingw32.pl is the one to be used for the
actual compiling (and for eve
Carlos Costa Portela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Can I put all the data that I want in a certificate, and then, sign it, or
> is there limitations?
Limitations of what kind? Specification, software, compatibility? If
you're talking about that MPEG of your cat thing (see http://
www.cs.auckland.ac.n
Juergen Moellenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> is there a Perl-Script (or whatever script) available which makes it
> easier to modify the #include path inside the .h files? For example,
> I would like to change the path from #include to
> #include "bn.h".
Why whould you need a perl script to do th
Ben Laurie wrote:
>
> Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
> >
> > Scheltema, R.A. wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I'm currently working on an implementation of a program using openssl. In
> > > this program it would be extremely usefull if I could pass data to the
> > > callback-functions in the way,
Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
>
> Scheltema, R.A. wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm currently working on an implementation of a program using openssl. In
> > this program it would be extremely usefull if I could pass data to the
> > callback-functions in the way, for example, the thread call-back met
> Hmmm ... so who is reporting this to the egcs guys?
Me!! ;)
I'm subscribed into EGCS-Bugs List...
T+
leo
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
Scheltema, R.A. wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm currently working on an implementation of a program using openssl. In
> this program it would be extremely usefull if I could pass data to the
> callback-functions in the way, for example, the thread call-back method is
> done (or x-event-methods, ...).
> > Well, to be honest I don't really have a clear clue:-) It just works! I
> > suppose egcs-1.1.2 optimizer takes it easier on for(;1;) than on
> > for(;;)...
>
> Hmmm ... so who is reporting this to the egcs guys?
already done.
regards,
-al.
_
On Wed, May 26, 1999 at 09:59:54AM -0400, Salz, Rich wrote:
>> It's much less confusing to have the header files in the same
>> directory as the corresponding source code than cramming all 50 of
>> them into a single directory.
> Seems to me the difference is "rc4.h" or "../include/rc4.h"
> when
> It's much less confusing to have the header files in the same
> directory as the corresponding source code than cramming all 50 of
> them into a single directory.
Seems to me the difference is "rc4.h" or "../include/rc4.h"
when editing.
The chance of editing the wrong file, need symlinks, etc.
Andy Polyakov wrote:
>
> > > > > on linux 2.2[.9] with egcs-1.1.2 and libc.5.4.46, the bignum test fails.
> > > > > with "./Configure no-asm linux-elf", test/bntest results in the attached
> > > > > output, which ends with "Left shift test failed!" the next test (exptest)
> > > > > appears to be
On Wed, May 26, 1999 at 11:48:59AM +1000, Ron Ramsay wrote:
> I, also, would prefer 'global' header files to be in the 'global'
> include directory.
Why? If you want to have the header files in once place so that you
can easily look at them on an OS where symbolic links are not
available, then
shi jin wrote:
>
> openssl 0.9.3, debug-linux-elf
>
> sj:apps# ./openssl ca -gencrl
>
> Electric Fence 2.0.5 Copyright (C) 1987-1998 Bruce Perens.
> Using configuration from /usr/local/ssl/openssl.cnf
> -BEGIN X509 CRL-
> MIIBDjCBuTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFADBgMQswCQYDVQQGEwJBVTEMMAoGA1UECBM
On Wed, May 26, 1999 at 12:30:23PM +0200, Rainer W. Gerling wrote:
> Compiling 0.9.3 under NT4/egcs-1.1.2 including the test went fine
> after I changed line 6 in util/pl/mingw32f.pl to read
> $o='/';
> that is one slash insteat of two backslash.
Presumably you should have used util/pl/Mingw32.
Hi all,
I'm currently working on an implementation of a program using openssl. In
this program it would be extremely usefull if I could pass data to the
callback-functions in the way, for example, the thread call-back method is
done (or x-event-methods, ...). The password method would look like:
Wade L. Scholine wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dr Stephen Henson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 1999 6:35 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: req_attributes
> >
> >
> > Wu Zhigang wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > can an expert give me some id
This stuff got me thinking...
Wouldn't it be nice to change all shell scripts to perl so they are easier
to
run under windows and other non-unix platforms ?
/Per
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Patrik Carlsson
> Sent: Wednesday, Ma
Hi,
is there a Perl-Script (or whatever script) available which makes it easier to
modify the #include path inside the .h files? For example, I would like to
change the path from #include to #include "bn.h".
Bye,
Juergen Moellenhoff
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi,
Compiling 0.9.3 under NT4/egcs-1.1.2 including the test went fine
after I changed line 6 in util/pl/mingw32f.pl to read
$o='/';
that is one slash insteat of two backslash.
Great job
Rainer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.0.2 -- QDPGP 2.60
Hello all!
Can I put all the data that I want in a certificate, and then, sign it, or
is there limitations?
Thanks in advance,
Carlos.
___Carlos Costa Portela___Password Technologies__
| e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.registros.net|
| www: htt
21 matches
Mail list logo
