RE: SSL_read problem?

1999-05-30 Thread Ron Ramsay
Yes, SSL_read() may only return one record. But the underlying recv() could have read 64K bytes (but I guess from what you have written that it would never read more than 16K). Further SSL_read()s would access the data previously recv()d. The fewer times recv() is called (for the same amount of d

Re: SSL_read problem?

1999-05-30 Thread Bodo Moeller
> While it is true that the maximum TLS record size is 16k, this doea not > relate directly to the TCP handling. > For example, the server hello, certificate request, etc are individual > records but they are all bundled into the one TCP record because it is > (apparently) more efficient to perfo

RE: SSL_read problem?

1999-05-30 Thread Ron Ramsay
While it is true that the maximum TLS record size is 16k, this doea not relate directly to the TCP handling. For example, the server hello, certificate request, etc are individual records but they are all bundled into the one TCP record because it is (apparently) more efficient to perform fewer r

[STATUS] OpenSSL (Sun 30-May-1999)

1999-05-30 Thread OpenSSL Project
OpenSSL STATUS Last modified at __ $Date: 1999/05/30 13:54:25 $ DEVELOPMENT STATE o OpenSSL 0.9.4: Under development... o OpenSSL 0.9.3a: Released on May 29th, 1999 o OpenSSL 0.9.3: Released on May

PEM_CTX

1999-05-30 Thread Ben Laurie
Is PEM_CTX actually used at all? I can't find any references to it! Cheers, Ben. -- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html "My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the first group; there was less compe

Problems installing OpenSSL

1999-05-30 Thread Craig Carey
BUG Report (tiny script/documentation bugs): I installed, successfully, OpenSSL into Windows 95, using a ECGS gcc compiler. Some problems occurred and they are mentioned here. If you wish to report a bug then please include the following information in any bug report: OpenS

Re: 0.9.3a released

1999-05-30 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > OK, I've rolled it and sent it to the FTP site. No need for fanfare, I > don't think. > Let's get back to work! :-) Thanks for your efforts, Ben. I'll update the website for us. Ralf S. Engelschall