Sun usparc / Solaris 2.6 openssl make bug.

Using openssl-0.9.3a, there appears to be a problem with crypto/md5/Makefile.ssl. # ./config -t Operating system: sun4u-sun-solaris2 Configuring for solaris-usparc-cc /opt/local/bin/perl ./Configure solaris-usparc-cc # ( ./config --prefix=/opt/local --openssldir=/opt/local ; make ) [...] making

error compiling openssl

My Sparc 10 with solaris 2.6 fails to compile openssl. I have included output from the "config -t" command and from make. I use gnu make version 3.74 Sincerely, Jesper Jorgensen - CAPUT Jesper Jorgensen Phone +45 3312 2442 Nygade 6 Product ManagerFax+45

Re: Sun usparc / Solaris 2.6 openssl make bug.

Continued bug report below. I have attempted to fix it, and only found things getting worse wyang wrote something like: > > Using openssl-0.9.3a, there appears to be a problem with > crypto/md5/Makefile.ssl. > > # ./config -t > Operating system: sun4u-sun-solaris2 > Configuring for solaris

replace rsaref ?

Hi! Can anyone tell me where in source I can find code which calls rsaref apis? Basically I am trying to understand the code so that I can replace rsaref with say - CDSA toolkit of HP-UX. Thanks -Samir _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo

Sparc Linux (RedHat 6.0) Patch

I was able to get openssl-0.9.3a to compile and pass all tests under SparcLinux (RedHat 6.0) with the following changes. My testing was done under the sun4c platform. --- openssl-0.9.3a/ConfigureSat May 29 07:13:50 1999 +++ orig/openssl-0.9.3a/Configure Thu Jul 1 13:57:09 1999 @@ -17

Re: ASN1_OBJECT to ascii?

> > I have an ASN1_OBJECT, which in this case is an OID. > How do I get a string out, like "1.2.4.122334.69" ? i2t_ASN1_OBJECT() ? Vadim __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mai

ASN1_OBJECT to ascii?

I have an ASN1_OBJECT, which in this case is an OID. How do I get a string out, like "1.2.4.122334.69" ? tnx. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List

non-ascii?

I think there are some bugs in the handling of non-ascii chars... 28 $ openssl x509 -in x -text Certificate: Data: Version: 3 (0x2) Serial Number: 4 (0x4) Signature Algorithm: md5WithRSAEncryption Issuer: C=US, O=MSFT, CN=Microsoft Authenticode(tm) Root Authori

PKCS 5 and 8 in openssl 0.9.2b

What would one have to do to lift the PKCS 5 and 8 support in the latest openssl snapshot and put it into 0.9.2b? Read only support that is. Or is this available in 0.9.2b and I've just missed it somehow? Simply using the latest openssl version would force my hand at applying the bsafe patch to

Re: creating a subset of openssl

> > Regarding scripts... I'm note even shure wether it makes sense > > to automate the extraction of the required algorithms... > > The documentation says it works. If that's an unnecessary feature, that's > fine, and I can modify the Makefile/Configure for our purposes, but the > docs should re

SSL_OP_NETSCAPE_CA_DN_BUG

Hi all, I have noticed that the SSL_OP_NETSCAPE_CA_DN_BUG option enables to modify slightly the DER-encoding of the CA's DNs that a TLS server sends to a client during the SSL3_ST_SW_CERT_REQ_A/B phase of the handshake. I suppose that it is for some NS Communicator versions but how can

Re: creating a subset of openssl

On Thu, 1 Jul 1999, Holger Reif wrote: > This issue seems to be the same as with Apache and SSL support. The > conclusion was to leave out all crypto related stuff and require some > patching. This way is sometimes not completely easy for the average > user that wants to include other modules a

Re: creating a subset of openssl

On Tue, 29 Jun 1999, Brian Wellington wrote: > - US Export control issues. We only need DSA, SHA1, MD5, and > randomness (and possibly RSA when the patent expires). Since BIND > must be exportable, it would be nice to be able to strip out the > code for unneeded algorithms before running config

Re: creating a subset of openssl

This issue seems to be the same as with Apache and SSL support. The conclusion was to leave out all crypto related stuff and require some patching. This way is sometimes not completely easy for the average user that wants to include other modules as well (which might conflicting patches). You