[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ulf Moeller) writes:
>> >Was I assuming too much when I assumed that OpenSSL would be a useful
>> >framework for implementing cryptosystems not currently used by SSL or
>> >TLS?
>>
>> It depends on what you want to do. I have found OpenSSL a very useful
>> basis for my OpenPGP
Roy Wood wrote:
>
> >> I suppose I ought to start thinking about submitting diffs back to the
> >> project, huh?
> >
> >Yes, please do so via openssl-dev list. But please
> >consider the following: (a) code needs to be somehow
> >stable since probably no other developer has a Mac
> >and can test
Ben Laurie wrote:
>
> Ulf Moeller wrote:
> >
> > >Was I assuming too much when I assumed that OpenSSL would be a useful
> > >framework for implementing cryptosystems not currently used by SSL or
> > >TLS?
> >
> > It depends on what you want to do. I have found OpenSSL a very useful
> > basis for
This is most probably due to the fact that nearly no implementation
of DES actually checks or cares in other ways about that parity
bits.
OTOH it would be good practice produce strictly, accept lazy)
to generate the correct parity for that key.
Jef Pearlman schrieb:
>
> Hi -- I'm not s
