On Sun, 17 Sep 2000, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> From: Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> kris> > kris> echo | openssl base64
> kris> > kris> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> [...]
> kris> > Whee indeed. However, I can't reproduce it with the latest beta.
> kris> > What version
Error build under NT 4, VC6
cl /Fotmp32dll\rand_win.obj -Iinc32 -Itmp32dll /MD /W3 /WX /G5 /Ox /O2
/Ob2 /Gs0 /GF /Gy /nologo -DWIN32 -DWIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN -DL_ENDIAN -DBN_ASM -DMD
5_ASM -DSHA1_ASM -DRMD160_ASM /Fdout32dll /GD -D_WINDLL -D_DLL -c .\crypto\rand
\rand_win.c
rand_win.c
.\cr
To change a RSA private key, you should manually change
the rsa->d,
and clear (free and set to NULL) the rsa->p, rsa->q, rsa->dmp1, rsa->dmq1,
and rsa->iqmp, because they are also generated in the RSA_generate_key() ,
and if they are generated, the computation will use them, not use the 'd' dire
OpenSSL version 0.9.6 Beta 2
OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS
http://www.openssl.org/
OpenSSL is currently in a release cycle. The second beta is now released.
This beta is in fact two releases, one for the current mainstream
OpenSSL, and
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
>
> I'm surprised this hasn't been discovered yet. Stephen just
> discovered that the default return value (the value returned when a
> specific control command is unimplemented) from the BIO *_ctrl()
> functions is 0. However, that is also an "OK" value fro
Idea: we might want to have a file called PROBLEMS or somesuch, in
which we enumerate known problems like this one. That would
communicate two things to the users: 1) that we know about the problem
and possibly that we're working on it, and 2) what changes to expect
as a result of this. The latt
I'm surprised this hasn't been discovered yet. Stephen just
discovered that the default return value (the value returned when a
specific control command is unimplemented) from the BIO *_ctrl()
functions is 0. However, that is also an "OK" value from a number of
the underlying functions, like fse
OpenSSL STATUS Last modified at
__ $Date: 2000/09/17 11:56:53 $
DEVELOPMENT STATE
o OpenSSL 0.9.6: Under development (in release cycle)...
Proposed release date September 24, 2000
I will start building 0.9.6 beta 2 by 1800 UTC today. If there are
any fixes that need to go in, please send or commit them before that.
Thank you.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chairman@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
Redakteur@Stacken \
From: Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
kris> > kris> echo | openssl base64
kris> > kris> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
[...]
kris> > Whee indeed. However, I can't reproduce it with the latest beta.
kris> > What version of OpenSSL did you use?
kris>
kris> 0.9.5a, the version included in Free
On Sun, 17 Sep 2000, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> From: Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> kris> echo | openssl base64
> kris> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> kris>
> kris> (gdb) bt
> [...]
> kris>
> kris> Whee! :-)
>
> Whee indeed. However, I can't reproduce it with the late
From: Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
kris> echo | openssl base64
kris> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
kris>
kris> (gdb) bt
[...]
kris>
kris> Whee! :-)
Whee indeed. However, I can't reproduce it with the latest beta.
What version of OpenSSL did you use?
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen
From: Dan Kingsbury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
danking> I just downloaded OpenSSL and tried building it for VMS,
danking> but cannot find the RSAREF library which the INSTALL.VMS
danking> file says is required. When I try to build it, the
danking> MAKEVMS.COM file says...
Actually, RSAref is *not* re
13 matches
Mail list logo
