Once again I'm getting unresolved symbols trying to compile the latest snapshot:
PKCS7_it
PKCS7_ATTR_SIGN_it
PKCS7_ATTR_VERIFY_it
PKCS7_ISSUER_AND_SERIAL_it
PKCS12_it
PKCS12_SAFEBAGS_it
PKCS12_AUTHSAFES_it
RSAPublicKey_it
RSAPrivateKey_it
Those are the missing symbols while linking openssl.exe.
From: "Rob Neff" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
neff.ra #ifdef MYDLL_EXPORTS
neff.ra #define MYDLL_API __declspec(dllexport)
neff.ra #else
neff.ra #define MYDLL_API __declspec(dllimport)
neff.ra #endif
neff.ra
neff.ra extern MYDLL_API int nTestdll;
neff.ra
neff.ra MYDLL_API int fnTestdll(void);
That's
Hi,
I would like to propose the following changes to the install:
1. Install man pages in MANDIR=$(INSTALLTOP)/man rather than
MANDIR=$(OPENSSLDIR)/man
2. Install both shared libraries and archive libraries when shared
libraries are built (and are distinguished from archive libraries,
e.g.,
This function takes in second argument filename of linear cert repository or
NULL. In third argument it takes the name of directory where I suppose it
searches for certs as needed; or NULL of course.
Now,
- if a file of certs is used, is it loaded to memory and then closed? That
is, can I simply
http://www.openssl.org/docs/ssl/SSL_CTX_load_verify_locations.html
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BTU Cottbus http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
Lehrstuhl Allgemeine Elektrotechnik Tel. +49 355 69-4129
Universitaetsplatz
From: David Scott Page [EMAIL PROTECTED]
page I would like to propose the following changes to the install:
page
page 1. Install man pages in MANDIR=$(INSTALLTOP)/man rather than
page MANDIR=$(OPENSSLDIR)/man
Consider passwd, and you'll understand why that move isn't too good...
page 2.
As some may know I'm currently messing around with the OpenSSL OCSP
code.
I've reached the point where I can fire off some sample requests to
responders using some prototype code: not committed yet.
So does anyone have some responder addresses I can test this stuff
against? I currently know of
Dr S N Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So does anyone have some responder addresses I can test this stuff against? I
currently know of two and there must be several more out there.
That may be all there are, I was testing this a while back and had a hell of a
time finding any responders
