I built and tested openssl-0.9.6a-beta3 on Cygwin and DJGPP, under
Windows98 and MS-DOS respectively. Since I am in the US, I built
without idea or rc5. Both make and "make test" work without major
problems, after the attached patch is applied. The DJGPP "make test"
complains about "unable to load
Richard Levitte wrote:
>
> The third beta release of OpenSSL 0.9.6a is now available from the
> OpenSSL FTP site ftp://ftp.openssl.org/source/>.
Passes all tests on Alpha, RedHat Linux 6.2. Great job, guys!
Paul Allen
--
Boeing Phantom Works \ Paul L. Allen, (425) 865-3297
M
On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> From: Admin Mailing Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> mlist> uhh, the 'a' on the version can be very deceiving.
> mlist> it denotes an alpha version of the version number stated.
>
> I'm sorry, it does not. There are no such rules, except
From: Admin Mailing Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
mlist> uhh, the 'a' on the version can be very deceiving.
mlist> it denotes an alpha version of the version number stated.
I'm sorry, it does not. There are no such rules, except some people
may do so (I have never before seen that definition). OUR
I have been developing a basic web server using openssl library. I have
succeeded MOSTLY in getting the ssl connection. However, I am receiving both
memory leaks and failed accept.
This is what Rational's Purify found.
[W] MLK: Memory leak of 248 bytes from 1 block allocated in CRYPTO_malloc
[W]
Is there any real reason ms/do_nt.bat should keep on forcing no-asm?
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chairman@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
Redakteur@Stacken \ SWEDEN \ or +46-709-50 36 10
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis
Noor Haizad Mohd Said wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> I need your help for this matter. I get stuck when trying to add new
> extension to x509 cert. In Windows 2000 Server, they add new extension
> for their x509 certificates called CA Version. I try to add that new oid
> into the config file but it
