Re: cvs commit: openssl/crypto/engine enginetest.c

2001-09-11 Thread Ben Laurie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: bodo10-Sep-2001 19:46:55 Modified:crypto/engine enginetest.c Log: avoid warning ('const' discarded) Revision ChangesPath 1.11 +2 -2 openssl/crypto/engine/enginetest.c Index: enginetest.c

Re: OPenSSL fails to accept certificate chains over 16K

2001-09-11 Thread Lutz Jaenicke
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 01:59:24PM +0200, Lutz Jaenicke wrote: I'll add it to the TODO list. If we change this to a dynamic limit, we could start with 16kB (platform independant) and then applications may decide at will. 16kB should be sufficient in most cases, because the construct was

Re: cvs commit: openssl/crypto/engine enginetest.c

2001-09-11 Thread Bodo Moeller
Ben Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED]: --- enginetest.c 2001/09/10 14:10:10 1.10 +++ enginetest.c 2001/09/10 17:46:54 1.11 @@ -234,8 +234,8 @@ } for(loop = 0; loop 512; loop++) { -

Re: IP renaming problem...

2001-09-11 Thread Bodo Moeller
Rich Salz [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Unfortunately, the OpenSSL wrapper around gethostbyname cache's lookup results forever, so you'll need to restart your application. I know you said you can't do that. Good luck figuring out how to address this. Infinite caching of gethostbyname() results is a

platform hpux-m68k-cc

2001-09-11 Thread Anton J. Gamel
Hi all! Compilation and tests succeeded in following (old) platform: Machine: HP 9000/400 m68040@25 HP-UX 9.1y2k 64Mb Compiler: cc, version A.B9.00.2A, HP series S300/S400 Configure: hpux-m68k-cc no-threads CFLAGS changed to CFLAG= -DDSO_DL -DNO_ASM -DB_ENDIAN -DBN_DIV2W -Aa -D_HPUX_SOURCE +O2

Removing X509 extensions

2001-09-11 Thread Gleison Santos
Hi, all. In a project I'm working now we don't want to use any X509 extensions, basically due to binary size limitation. I've commented a lot a source code, removing any reference to X509_EXTENSION structure. But during server certificate validation I get a error while validating the second

Re: Removing X509 extensions

2001-09-11 Thread Dr S N Henson
Gleison Santos wrote: Hi, all. In a project I'm working now we don't want to use any X509 extensions, basically due to binary size limitation. I've commented a lot a source code, removing any reference to X509_EXTENSION structure. But during server certificate validation I get a error

has anyone ported SSL to pSOS

2001-09-11 Thread Vidya Kumble (EWC)
Title: has anyone ported SSL to pSOS Hi everybody Could someone give me information of porting OpenSSL to pSOS. Has anyone tried it, if so could you please let me know the risks involved in it. if you know any links from where i can download open SSL code that has been already ported to the