make falied

2001-09-30 Thread Offer Kaye
I did: ./config --prefix=/nafs/users/oferk/OpenSSH_Apps --openssldir=/nafs/users/of erk/OpenSSH_Apps/OpenSSL-0.9.6b no-shared then: make which crashed. Here are the last few lines: gcc -I.. -I../../include -DTHREADS -DDSO_DL -D_REENTRANT -O3 -DB_ENDIAN -DB N_DIV2W -c bn_asm.c -o bn_asm.o gcc:

Re: bug

2001-09-30 Thread Andy Polyakov
> Building OpenSSL fails, see attachment. Please advise. It's not OpenSSL problem. > OpenSSL self-test report: > ... > Compiler: Configured with: ../configure --with-as=/usr/local/bin/as ... ^ > ... > gcc ... > /

Re: error while installing openssl

2001-09-30 Thread Andy Polyakov
> I'm having the following error while installing openssl > Please help me resolve this issue It's not OpenSSL problem. > OpenSSL self-test report: > ... > Compiler: Configured with: ../configure --with-as=/usr/local/bin/as ...

[STATUS] OpenSSL (Sun 30-Sep-2001)

2001-09-30 Thread OpenSSL Project
OpenSSL STATUS Last modified at __ $Date: 2001/09/25 11:01:14 $ DEVELOPMENT STATE o OpenSSL 0.9.7: Under development... o OpenSSL 0.9.6b: Released on July 9th, 2001 o OpenSSL 0.9.6a: Released on April

Re: [PATCH] get rid of annoying BN_DIV2W mulitple def warnings

2001-09-30 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
From: Leon Avery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> leon> This is a very minor patch. It gets rid of an annoying warning that occurs leon> when BN_DIV2W is defined with a -D on the command line and also in bn.h. Unfortunately, that patch changes the semantics radically, since it first checks if the macro is

Re: test/tsid fails?

2001-09-30 Thread Andy Polyakov
> Quite odd, on another Linux, the tests go through with no problem: > > Linux levitte 2.2.14-5.0 #1 Tue Mar 7 21:07:39 EST 2000 i686 unknown > > The only other difference I can think of is that on the failing > machine, the gcc version is 3.0.2 Where have you got 3.0.2 from? > while on the m

announcement of the rescheduled directory meeting in Flagstaff

2001-09-30 Thread Hoyt L. Kesterson II
hello all The announcement of the rescheduled Flagstaff meeting is at ftp://ftp.bull.com/pub/OSIdirectory/Flagstaff2001/announcementRev3.pdf The major differences in the announcement are; The date is 12 - 16 November 2001 The agenda is changed - e.g., work on X.509/part 8 is now on 12 an