I did:
./config --prefix=/nafs/users/oferk/OpenSSH_Apps --openssldir=/nafs/users/of
erk/OpenSSH_Apps/OpenSSL-0.9.6b no-shared
then:
make
which crashed. Here are the last few lines:
gcc -I.. -I../../include -DTHREADS -DDSO_DL -D_REENTRANT -O3 -DB_ENDIAN -DB
N_DIV2W -c bn_asm.c -o bn_asm.o
gcc:
> Building OpenSSL fails, see attachment. Please advise.
It's not OpenSSL problem.
> OpenSSL self-test report:
> ...
> Compiler: Configured with: ../configure --with-as=/usr/local/bin/as ...
^
> ...
> gcc ...
> /
> I'm having the following error while installing openssl
> Please help me resolve this issue
It's not OpenSSL problem.
> OpenSSL self-test report:
> ...
> Compiler: Configured with: ../configure --with-as=/usr/local/bin/as ...
OpenSSL STATUS Last modified at
__ $Date: 2001/09/25 11:01:14 $
DEVELOPMENT STATE
o OpenSSL 0.9.7: Under development...
o OpenSSL 0.9.6b: Released on July 9th, 2001
o OpenSSL 0.9.6a: Released on April
From: Leon Avery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
leon> This is a very minor patch. It gets rid of an annoying warning that occurs
leon> when BN_DIV2W is defined with a -D on the command line and also in bn.h.
Unfortunately, that patch changes the semantics radically, since it
first checks if the macro is
> Quite odd, on another Linux, the tests go through with no problem:
>
> Linux levitte 2.2.14-5.0 #1 Tue Mar 7 21:07:39 EST 2000 i686 unknown
>
> The only other difference I can think of is that on the failing
> machine, the gcc version is 3.0.2
Where have you got 3.0.2 from?
> while on the m
hello all
The announcement of the rescheduled Flagstaff meeting is at
ftp://ftp.bull.com/pub/OSIdirectory/Flagstaff2001/announcementRev3.pdf
The major differences in the announcement are;
The date is 12 - 16 November 2001
The agenda is changed - e.g., work on X.509/part 8 is now on 12 an