On 02-03-25 18:03:56 CET, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
> Thus spake Robert Joop:
> > the explanation of the -utf8 option doesn't make sense, does it?
> I think the document means "8-bit characters in an unspecified code
> page" instead of ASCII; however, there's no short term for that.
so what?
from th
On 02-03-26 12:09:59 CET, Robert Joop wrote:
> On 02-03-25 18:03:56 CET, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
> > Here's the more interesting question: why do we have a switch for
> > UTF-8 encoding, instead of determining it from the user's locale?
>
> what is the canonical way to detect this?
following up to
Hello, All!
I make a program that encrypts a text string using EVP_Encrypt... functions.
The encrypted data is in binary format i.e is in non ASCII
My question is if there is a way to convert the encrypted data into ASCII
string using OpenSSL library and back (the converted data) into the
encry
At 01:14 PM 3/26/02 +0100, you wrote:
>On 02-03-26 12:09:59 CET, Robert Joop wrote:
> > On 02-03-25 18:03:56 CET, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
> > > Here's the more interesting question: why do we have a switch for
> > > UTF-8 encoding, instead of determining it from the user's locale?
> >
> > what is th
Valery wrote:
> I make a program that encrypts a text string using EVP_Encrypt... functions.
>
> The encrypted data is in binary format i.e is in non ASCII
>
> My question is if there is a way to convert the encrypted data into ASCII
> string using OpenSSL library and back (the converted data)
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 03:19:33PM +0100, Michael Bell wrote:
> I used "openssl ca -subj ...".
>
> If I used serialNumber in the DN then OpenSSL reports the following:
>
> The Subject's Distinguished Name is as follows
> serialNumber :PRINTABLE:'02'
> commonName:PRINTABLE:'r
>
> I have just checked in an according patch. Please note that objects.h
> is no longer used (well, the file is still available, but the actual
> information is #ifdef'ed out and obj_mac.h is included).
> Please test out the next snapshot.
I made the objects.txt patch to my source tree about a
From: "Kenneth R. Robinette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
support> In the latest 0.9.7 SNAPS, when using the default DES behavior, the
support> function user function des_random_seed is getting defined to
support> DES_random_seed, which is coming up as undefined in the link step.
That was fixed today.
Hello,
I discovered a small bug in X509_check_private_key.
EVP_PKEY *X509_get_pubkey(X509 *x)
{
if ((x == NULL) || (x->cert_info == NULL))
return(NULL);
return(X509_PUBKEY_get(x->cert_info->key));
}
int X509_check_private_key(X509 *x, EVP_PKEY *k)
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 02:53:22PM +0100, Maas-Maarten Zeeman wrote:
> I discovered a small bug in X509_check_private_key.
>
> EVP_PKEY *X509_get_pubkey(X509 *x)
> {
> if ((x == NULL) || (x->cert_info == NULL))
> return(NULL);
> return(X509_PUBKEY_get(x->cert_info-
In crypto/md5/md5_dgst.c, there is lots of code as follows,
/* Round 0 */
R0(A,B,C,D,X[ 0], 7,0xd76aa478L);
R0(D,A,B,C,X[ 1],12,0xe8c7b756L);
R0(C,D,A,B,X[ 2],17,0x242070dbL);
R0(B,C,D,A,X[ 3],22,0xc1bdceeeL);
...
This expands to the following on an ARM p
All,
The current kssl_ctx_setprinc does not handle instances. I may have
a principal of: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" or
(technically) "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". The current
implementation will only place "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" in
kssl_ctx->client_princ.
These different parts of the
From: "Kenneth R. Robinette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: InterSoft International, Inc.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date sent: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 14:32:17 -0600
Subject:OpenSSL 0.9.7 SNAP
Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTE
On 02-03-26 15:01:37 CET, George Rogers wrote:
> Have you guys forgotten that the client and server are on different ends of
> the
> wire? Which end of the wire is going to use the certificate? Which end of
> the
> wire is creating the certificate? The switch has to be there to allow
> creat
So I'm attempting to verify a certificate with OpenSSL 0.9.7 snapshot
(various versions). I trust my own CA, who's certificate is issued by a
Root (self-signed) CA that I do not wish to trust, because it has also
issued a CA certificate to Bad Guy Incorporated.
Right now if I build a chain up to
15 matches
Mail list logo
