HTML
HEAD
META NAME=GENERATOR Content=Microsoft DHTML Editing Control
TITLE/TITLE
/HEAD
BODY
P align=centerA href=http://www.seven21.biz;IMG
align=baseline alt= border=0 hspace=0
src=http://www.seven21.biz/images/noname3_0001.gif;/ABRÁ¤º¸Åë½Å¸Á ÀÌ¿ëÃËÁø ¹×
Á¤º¸ º¸È£ µî¿¡ °üÇÑ ¹ý·ü Á¦
50Á¶¿¡
Obviously the proposed expression to catch junk like this for postfix
is not good enough:
/[^[:print:]]{8}/ REJECT Your mailer is not RFC 2047 compliant
I'll have to work on more restrictive options :-(
For now I have disabled
OnCreate NotifyRequestorsAndCcs with template
Title: Subject Alternative Name : openssl and RFC 2459
Hi
I Have read RFC 2459 about Subject Alternative Name. This Subject Alternative Name is defined in this way :
id-ce-subjectAltName OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-ce 17 }
SubjectAltName ::= GeneralNames
GeneralNames ::= SEQUENCE SIZE
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed May 15 13:25:14 2002]:
Hi!
i use Your project in my Client-Server project.
For example, my Server calls BIO functions to use opened socket
for handshaking , after that init_ssl_connection and everything works
fine.
But what will happen if i'll try to use client
Hi Mrs
I am a PHD and i need some informations to see the
costs of the cryptographics loads in WTLS.
Is there any benchmark to compte the delay of
RSA certificate encryption SHA-1, and DES (in a palm pilot)
have you a benchmark also for the fixed network
with RSA 512?
if not:
It is
On Wed, May 15, 2002, CAMUS Sylvie FTRD/DTL/ISS wrote:
Hi
I Have read RFC 2459 about Subject Alternative Name. This Subject
Alternative Name is defined in this way :
id-ce-subjectAltName OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-ce 17 }
SubjectAltName ::= GeneralNames
GeneralNames ::=
