> > However, the assignments are not atomic. The following unprotected
> > operation:
> >
> > if (init)
> > {
> > memcpy((char *)&SSLv3_server_data,(char *)sslv3_base_method(),
> > sizeof(SSL_METHOD));
> > SSLv3_server_data.ssl_accept=ssl3_accept;
> >
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002, Chris Brook wrote:
> I have found the problem and fixed it in my code, so please ignore.
> However, for general info, it seems that the i2d_ low-level functions modify
> the data pointer passed in (it is an unsigned char **), so I could not see
> the result. Copying the poi
I have found the problem and fixed it in my code, so please ignore.
However, for general info, it seems that the i2d_ low-level functions modify
the data pointer passed in (it is an unsigned char **), so I could not see
the result. Copying the pointer to another and passing the address of that
in
Using 0.9.7 beta 3, I am attempting to output an RSA public/private key pair
created by RSA_generate_key() as ASN.1 encoded strings.
For the public key, I am using i2d_RSA_PUBKEY which calls i2d_PUBKEY ->
i2d_X509_PUBKEY. i2d_X509_PUBKEY seems to execute though I can't find the
code anywhere in t
Dear OpenSSL developers,
I have noticed that a warning is issued when compiling Openssl in MSVC.
To remove it I suggest the following two small changes:
In file openssl/asn1_mac.h
Change in the definition of M_ASN1_D2I_get_EXP_set_opt the line
(void (*)())free_func, b,V_ASN1_UNIVERSAL) =
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 10:34:27AM +0200, Bodo Moeller wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 01:44:01PM +0200, Bodo Moeller via RT wrote:
> >
>
> I don't know why that message is empty. What I wrote is that this
> should now be fixed in the current snapshots (0.9.6-stable and
> 0.9.8-dev -- seems I
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 05:29:41PM -0700, Patrick McCormick wrote:
> I needed to add the following calls in my single-thread "openssl setup" code
> to end several race conditions:
>
> SSLv23_client_method();
> SSLv2_client_method();
> SSLv3_client_method();
> TLSv1_client_method();
> S
On Freitag, 20. September 2002 00:43, vze2ksv3 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have downloaded openssl-engine-0.9.6g
>
> I try to run openssl ca -policy policy_anthing -out newcert.pem -passin
> pass:whatever -key whatever
> -extensions xpclient_ext -extfile xpextensions \
> -infiles newreq.pem
>
> It complain
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 06:28:16PM -0700, Patrick McCormick wrote:
>> No locking should be needed because the assignments are idempotent.
> However, the assignments are not atomic. The following unprotected
> operation:
>
> if (init)
> {
> memcpy((char *)&SSLv3_server_data
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 06:28:16PM -0700, Patrick McCormick wrote:
>> No locking should be needed because the assignments are idempotent.
> However, the assignments are not atomic. The following unprotected
> operation:
>
> if (init)
> {
> memcpy((char *)&SSLv3_server_data,
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 01:44:01PM +0200, Bodo Moeller via RT wrote:
>
I don't know why that message is empty. What I wrote is that this
should now be fixed in the current snapshots (0.9.6-stable and
0.9.8-dev -- seems I forgot about 0.9.7-stable, this will have the
fix tomorry).
--
Bodo M
Here is the patch for configuring-out the engine. This one should work; the
previous one had a single misplaced #ifndef. I've tested it both with and
without the no-engine option for the following platforms:
Cygwin
VC-WIN32 (dll and static)
VC-CE (dll and static)
12 matches
Mail list logo