> I wrote that the next snapshots should solve the problem. Functions
>
> SSLv23_client_method(), SSLv23_server_method(),
> SSLv2_client_method(),SSLv2_server_method(),
> SSLv3_client_method(),SSLv3_server_method(),
> TLSv1_client_method(),TLSv1_serve
Greetings:
Certicom has intellectual property rights relating to safe primes in DH and
point compression in elliptic-curve cryptography.
I ask that the following patches be implemented to inform people of
these facts.
Sincerely,
john
--
john o goyo <[
Yes, the
if (test)
lock()
if (test)
construct is very important (although I thought I saw a bug about
JVM implementations getting this wrong).
Anyone doing threads programming should read Andrew Birrell's 1989 tutorial.
http://gatekeeper.dec.com/pub/DEC/SRC
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 03:47:14PM -0700, Patrick McCormick wrote:
> Many thanks for putting in a lock. However, the race condition has not been
> eliminated.
> [...]init must be checked after the lock is entered in order to
> prevent the client_data setup from happening twice. So,
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 03:47:14PM -0700, Patrick McCormick wrote:
> Many thanks for putting in a lock. However, the race condition has not been
> eliminated.
> [...]init must be checked after the lock is entered in order to
> prevent the client_data setup from happening twice. So,
I get reports again that the crypt() macro gets in the way for some
applications. I'm strongly thinking of disabling it entirely. Anyone
against?
If I don't hear any complaints about the thought before the weekend,
I'll carry on with it, in 0.9.7 and 0.9.7-dev.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannväg
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
0.9.7 caused massive havoc compiling kerberos 4 (and to some extent 5) when
I integrated beta 3 into the freebsd tree. The crypt() macro was a minor
annoyance. The bigger problem was the redefinition of the DES key state
block (from array to struct). openbsd apparently has workarounds that
incl
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 05:31:08PM +0200, Bodo Moeller via RT wrote:
>
As usual, I really wrote that the bug will be fixed in the next
snapshot (but RT2 still does not believe me :-).
--
Bodo Möller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PGP http://www.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de/TI/Mitarbeiter/moeller/0x36d2c65
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 08:49:47AM -0400, John O Goyo wrote:
> Certicom has intellectual property rights relating to safe primes in DH [...]
> + Certicom has intellectual property rights relating to the use of safe primes
> + in the DH key-exchange, including US patent 5,933,504 and pending US
>
John O Goyo wrote:
> Greetings:
>
> Certicom has intellectual property rights relating to safe primes in DH and
> point compression in elliptic-curve cryptography.
Really? Has that been tested?
> I ask that the following patches be implemented to inform people of
> these facts.
Why would we wa
> You are absolutely right, of course. I got similar constructs right
> in the past, but I guess this time I was too busy with various other
> things to really think about what I was writing ...
>
> The next snapshot should really fix the problem.
I looked at the changes in CVS and everything s
In 0.9.7-stable ssltest.c, lines 408 & 416 need terminating brackets.
Chris Brook
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automate
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 03:43:09PM -0400, Chris Brook wrote:
> In 0.9.7-stable ssltest.c, lines 408 & 416 need terminating brackets.
> Chris Brook
Thanks, fixed,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
BTU Cottbu
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Sep 24 10:23:50 2002]:
> Hi,
> I am trying to install openssl on AIX using gcc
>
> GCC version - 2.95.3 20010315 (release)
> AIX version - 4.3.2.0
> OpenSSL version - 0.9.7-dev
>
> The output of config -t is attached.
> The make is not sucessful. The following is the e
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 06:43:21PM +0200, Bodo Moeller wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 04:26:00PM +0200, Bodo Moeller via RT wrote:
>
> >
>
> Somehow the RT2 system doesn't like the comments I enter at the
> website when resolving a ticket ...
I am not yet sure (would need to do a test), but
> You are absolutely right, of course. I got similar constructs right
> in the past, but I guess this time I was too busy with various other
> things to really think about what I was writing ...
>
> The next snapshot should really fix the problem.
I looked at the changes in CVS and everything se
17 matches
Mail list logo