Re: crypto/perlasm/x86unix.pl

> It looks like the PIC changes to crypto/perlasm/x86unix.pl break > on non gcc compilers. First of all it's an assembler issue, not compiler. And I don't think it's GNU vs. vendor assembler issue, ... > UX:acomp: ERROR: "asm/dx86unix.cpp", line 122: invalid input token: 1f > UX:acomp: ERROR: "as

Re: Compiling Failed

> > Got error when compiling 0.9.7 beta 6: > > > > -- > > > > gcc -E -DOUT asm/dx86unix.cpp | as -o asm/dx86-out.o > > des-586.s: Assembler messages: > > des-586.s:2458: Error: Unimplemented segment type 135296 in > > parse_operand(.L009cbc_enc_jmp_table-.L008PIC_point(%edx)) >

[openssl.org #404] maketest.log

Make sure the directory you're compiling the toolkit in is "mounted" with binmode option. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[openssl.org #410] Re: HP-UX build problems with 0.9.6h

I'm resolving this ticket in sincere faith that BN_kronecker issue is a user environmental problem, i.e. either dependency rules inconsistency or a compiler bug, and other problems were already addressed. __ OpenSSL Project

[openssl.org #422] HOWTO Contribution (forgot to name my attachment)

Hi there, I just send the file with the last email, but I forgot to name the HOWTO when I sent it. Many apologies for cluttering the mail lists like this. William Michael Grim Student, Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville Unix System Administrator, SIUE, Computer Science dept. Phone: (21

[openssl.org #341] problems with "make" on jaguar mac os x 10.2

[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Nov 14 10:08:34 2002]: (Error report from requestor deleted)... > The same errors or different ones? No more information could be obtained. I therefore consider this issue to be resolved. Best regards, Lutz ___

[openssl.org #342] Linking with libeay32.a and libssl32.a

[levitte - Tue Nov 19 09:41:32 2002]: > I'll admit I don't know anything about Mingw32. And I know just a > little bit about Windows. In Windows, there's the concept of import > libraries, and if I understand the Mingw32 building procedures > properly, libeay32.a and libssl32.a are import

[openssl.org #364] Fw: BUG ?: ssl_bio.c increase reference count (BIO_push), but doesn't remove it (BIO_pop)

The problem was not tackled in time for the 0.9.7 release. I therefore move it forward to 0.9.7a! Best regards, Lutz __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List

[openssl.org #387] Difference between SSL.H and SYMHACKS.H

[levitte - Tue Dec 10 09:03:57 2002]: > This has been resolved in 0.9.7, where there are easier mechanisms to > include platform information than has ever been available on 0.9.6. > > I don't know how to solve this elegantly in 0.9.6, which is apparently > the development branch you're ta

[openssl.org #359] Calling SSL_read and SSL_write with non-empty error stack may cause an error

There was no time to solve this problem before the release of 0.9.7. The ticket is therefore moved forward to 0.9.7a. Best regards, Lutz __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org De

[openssl.org #272] BN gives wrong result for mod_exp (all forms)

[appro - Fri Dec 20 10:50:43 2002]: > The bugexptest.c problem is already addressed in 0.9.7-beta6. As for > HEAD/0.9.8 it will be addressed next year. Therefore the ticken remains > open. If I understand you correctly, the 0.9.7 related part of the problem is resolved. Therefore the Mil

[openssl.org #384] bug-report

[jaenicke - Fri Dec 13 10:43:35 2002]: > [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Dec 5 09:05:47 2002]: > > > Hi > > I have a bug-report. when I compile the openssl-0.9.6g on AIX5L,I > found > > some problem. > > my compile envirement is > > OS: AIX5L > > specfile: (See attached file: opensslg.spec)

Re: [openssl.org #272] BN gives wrong result for mod_exp (all forms)

> If I understand you correctly, the 0.9.7 related part of the problem is > resolved. Yes. > Therefore the Milestone should be moved to 0.9.8, shouldn't > it? Done. A. __ OpenSSL Project http://

[openssl.org #406] OpenSSL on Sparc64

[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Dec 18 08:58:59 2002]: > starting big number library test, could take a while... > test BN_add > test BN_sub > test BN_lshift1 > test BN_lshift (fixed) > test BN_lshift > test BN_rshift1 > test BN_rshift > test BN_sqr > Square test failed! > *** Error code 1

Re: Re: Compiling Failed

FYI, I compiled this version successfully by setting -no-asm flag. > > Got error when compiling 0.9.7 beta 6:> >> > --> >> > gcc -E -DOUT asm/dx86unix.cpp | as -o asm/dx86-out.o> > des-586.s: Assembler messages:> > des-586.s:2458: Error: Unimplemented segment type 135296 in> > p

[ANNOUNCE] OpenSSL 0.9.7 released

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- OpenSSL version 0.9.7 released === OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS http://www.openssl.org/ The OpenSSL project team is pleased to announce the release of version 0.9.7 of our open source toolkit for SSL/TLS

Re: [ANNOUNCE] OpenSSL 0.9.7 released

On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 01:34:07AM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: > o Support for new platforms: Windows CE, Tandem OSS, A/UX, AIX 64-bit, > Linux x86_64, Linux 64-bit on Sparc v9 OpenSSL does not compile out of the box on FreeBSD/SPARC (see attached) - it tries to use

Re: [ANNOUNCE] OpenSSL 0.9.7 released

On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 10:45:30PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 01:34:07AM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: > > > o Support for new platforms: Windows CE, Tandem OSS, A/UX, AIX 64-bit, > > Linux x86_64, Linux 64-bit on Sparc v9 > > OpenSSL does no