[openssl.org #438] SCEP

2003-01-05 Thread Massimiliano Pala via RT
Hi, its been quite a while since we heard last time, I hope you remember me. I have (quite) ended support for the SCEP messages for our project and I think it could be a useful addon to OpenSSL. The code is quite clean and could be added to the command line utility as 'openssl scep .. '. What

[openssl.org #439] OpenSSL Bug(?) - make test (SHA) failure

2003-01-05 Thread root via RT
Attached is the result of OpenSSL 'make report', following a failure of 'make test', as requested in the INSTALL file, section 3. At this point, all I have done is downloaded the source code, and run configure, make, and make test. As you will be able to see from the log the reported failure is

[openssl.org #439] OpenSSL Bug(?) - make test (SHA) failure (fwd) (Additional)

2003-01-05 Thread root via RT
Having rebuild with no optimisation (changed -O3 to -O0) the tests have now passed. One other minor issue to note: The INSTALL document (section 3) make test refers to the CFLAGS line in Makefile.ssl - The makefile actually contains CFLAG (note no 'S'), which meant that searching for it failed.

[openssl.org #440] AutoReply: wrong read() protype

2003-01-05 Thread OpenSSL-Bugs
Greetings, This message has been automatically generated in response to the creation of a trouble ticket regarding: wrong read() protype, a summary of which appears below. There is no need to reply to this message right now. Your ticket has been assigned an ID of

Re: [openssl.org #22] [PATCH] to dev build 20020428 for Win64 on Itanium

2003-01-05 Thread Andy Polyakov via RT
... or does size_t matter:-) I had a look at BRANCH_WIN64 last night and here're some thoughts. First of all I want to point out that I had rather fast look so that this is probably not a final judgment:-) As discussed earlier Win64 implements P64 programming model and so the discussion started

Re: crypto/perlasm/x86unix.pl

2003-01-05 Thread Tim Rice
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Tim Rice wrote: On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Andy Polyakov wrote: [snip] The assembler modules compile fine on UnixWare. I'll try and test SCO OpenServer 5 this weekend. The assembler modules compile fine on SCO OpenServer 5 too. A couple of problems. The cc on UnixWare