To whom it may concern,
I'm not sure of the format you require for bug reports but I'll try to
limit this email to pertinent info only...
Summary: Our application uses Pocket IE v3.02 on WinCE to communicate with
our secure webserver (apache + mod_ssl). When we upgraded the server's
openssl from
At 07:48 10/06/03 -0700, you wrote:
>Thierry Boivin wrote:
>>I agree with you about the way to build the initial "ctr" value from the "nonce"
>>value. My question is different : whithin the encryption of a whole plaintext
>>message (so a big block to be divided into 128 bit length blocks) , why
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 10 Jun 2003 23:20:30 +0200 (CEST), Richard
Levitte - VMS Whacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
levitte> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 10 Jun 2003 11:17:02 -0600, "Verdon
Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
levitte> VWalker> BTW, the code won't compile be
---
Trinh Anh Tuan - CMO-CFTI/NACENTECH
Ministry of Science & Technologies
Off. Tel.: (84-4) 8541197 - Off. Fax: (84-4) 8548187
CellPhone: (84) 913-323266
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 10 Jun 2003 11:17:02 -0600, "Verdon Walker"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
VWalker> I have a patch ready to be submitted which will add NetWare support to
VWalker> OpenSSL 0.9.7. I have tested it with the latest snapshots and everything
VWalker> is looking good.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003, Bryce Howard wrote:
>
> I was afraid I was duplicating something else out there, seems that this is not
> so. I will clean up the code a bit this week and submit it with the method that
> Geoff suggested.
>
I have also written a CAPI ENGINE but it had to do various evil th
I was afraid I was duplicating something else out there, seems that this is not
so. I will clean up the code a bit this week and submit it with the method that
Geoff suggested.
--- "Kenneth R. Robinette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bryce
>
> Why not make the MS CAPI engine available for downloa
Yes I for one am interested.
- Joel Daniels
- Original Message -
From: "Kenneth R. Robinette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 6:41 AM
Subject: Re: MS CAPI OpenSSL Engine?
> Bryce
>
> Why not make the MS CAPI engine available for download. We a
I have a patch ready to be submitted which will add NetWare support to
OpenSSL 0.9.7. I have tested it with the latest snapshots and everything
is looking good. I would like the patch to go into the 0.9.8 branch as
well as the 0.9.7 branch, but when I downloaded the latest snapshot
(6-10) for 0.9.8
Thierry Boivin wrote:
I agree with you about the way to build the initial "ctr" value from the "nonce" value. My question is different : whithin the encryption of a whole plaintext message (so a big block to be divided into 128 bit length blocks) , why to increment ctr by 2^64 instead of 1 from b
Hi,
Why SSL connection is not broken even if I call SSL_free and
SSL_CTX_free ?
Lukasz Wójcicki
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
Title: RE: possible problems with RAND_seed()
Sorry, i forgot that part.
I am running 0.9.7b on Solaris 7 64-bit. And that makes sense about AES requiring 32 bytes. My 32-bit version was an older version, 0.9.6e i think. So it would still only use the128 bits.
Thanks for clearing that up
Satoshi Inoue wrote:
Hi all,
Hi Satoshi,
I've been looking into the recent (well, what's recent you might say but
never mind ;) changes made in CVS repository, and found this:
- http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=9280
What will be an impact of not applying this fix (other than
uninitialized mem
Bryce
Why not make the MS CAPI engine available for download. We are interested and I
suspect quite a few others would have an interest also. I suspect a lot of people are
interested but don't want to admit they use Microsoft. You know, only the big boys
use
OpenSSL on UNIX. However, the t
For one I know CAPI doesn't support OAEP yet (not part of the TLS spec, right?)
but yes I was confused by the padding they used. Eventually I realized that the
padding the MS CAPI uses is dependent upon the context of the RSA operation,
signing or key-exchange. When encrypting w/ the public key PK
I agree with you about the way to build the initial "ctr" value from the "nonce"
value. My question is different : whithin the encryption of a whole plaintext message
(so a big block to be divided into 128 bit length blocks) , why to increment ctr by
2^64 instead of 1 from block to block ?
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 04:41:01PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I had a 32-bit application that was working fine, but when i compiled it as
> 64-bit, it started to fail. I was getting this error: "PRNG not seeded".
>
> I read the documents and FAQ, and it states that the library needs to be
Ok.
Didn't you have to many problems with the PADDING ? If I recall well CAPI
doesn't suppport all the PADDINGS used by opnessl.
Frédéric Giudicelli
http://www.newpki.org
- Original Message -
From: "Bryce Howard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003
In summary the MS CAPI engine provides:
- Support for RSA signing and verification operations that will work w/
non-exportable MS CAPI private keys, should work with any CAPI-compliant HW
token (testing it w/ Rainbow iKey's this week)
- Full access to any MS CAPI keystore, implemented a certificat
Hallo,
I have trouble with the header files in openssl distribution and I would
like to ask you for hints.
I am compiling smime-0.7 util of Sampo and the compiling said errors with a
non-existed member named "req_kludge" in X509_REQ_INFO structure in
include/openssl/x509.h file. This happened wi
20 matches
Mail list logo
