hi there, i tried sending this ages ago but i guess some spam filters
probably lost it... i see i have to be subscribed to post stuff.
on a p4 2.4GHz, here's the before:
signverifysign/s verify/s
rsa 1024 bits 0.0044s 0.0002s225.5 4139.4
and after:
Hi Richard,
I have not tested it yet, sorry. I will download it this weekend and let
you know how it went.
Regards,
Zoltan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 19/06/2003 21:52:01:
Any results?
[levitte - Wed Jun 11 23:24:18 2003]:
I've added ean entry for X509_TRUST_OBJECT_SIGN in trstandard[].
Hi All
I have CA certificates and CRLs in one file. I am passing this file to SSL_CTX_load_verify_locations().
SSL_CTX_load_verify_location() indirectly calls PEM_X509_INFO_read_bio()
X509_load_cert_crl_file().
PEM_X509_INFO_read_bio() pushes X509_INFO object onto the stack
(B
(B
(BHi,all
(BI am studying the openssl ocsp.
(B
(BI would like to know , when use the -signer or -signkey option of the OCSP,
(Bis there any format limitation of this signer file or signer key file?
(B
(BI have a PKCS#12 certificate1(can be found in the end of this mail ) which
Hi Gilad,
You have to made some little changes in mod_ssl (like defining
SSL_EXPERIMENTAL_ENGINE ,
generating temp keys, how to init terminate the engine).
In attached you can find my patch to mod_ssl.
Once you have initialized the engine in your application, your RSA_method
calls are redireted
dean gaudet wrote:
hi there, i tried sending this ages ago but i guess some spam filters
probably lost it... i see i have to be subscribed to post stuff.
Actually, I've been sitting on it waiting for some free time to take a
look :-)
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html
Hi Richard,
I have checked openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20030620, the change you had made
is all right.
Regards,
Zoltan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 19/06/2003 21:52:01:
Any results?
[levitte - Wed Jun 11 23:24:18 2003]:
I've added ean entry for X509_TRUST_OBJECT_SIGN in trstandard
Sorry, I have been kind swanped latelly, I didn't have any time to reply to
your previous email, although I read it.
Why couldn't we just say that this function, is to use in some special
cases, in my case I need because I don't want an error handling function
being capable of calling