0.9.7 Dec 28 2004 CVS
UnixWare 2.03 has no strings.h
.
making all in crypto...
cc -I. -I.. -I../include -DOPENSSL_THREADS -Kthread -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5
-DOPENSSL_NO_IDEA -DOPENSSL_NO_RC5 -DOPENSSL_NO_MDC2 -DOPENSSL_NO_MD2 -DFILIO_H
-DNO_STRINGS_H -c o_str.c
UX:acomp: ERROR: "o_st
[steve - Mon May 19 13:37:13 2003]:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon May 19 04:11:09 2003]:
>
> > Did you tried to do this on Cygwin? I also manually rebuilt obj_dat.h
> > and
> > the result was the same (on Cygwin).
> >
> > Finally, I changed "by hand" the generated obj_dat.h file and I
> > managed t
Keep in mind that [unlike Gladman's code] OpenSSL code has to be
position
independent! It surely no problem on x86_64, but on x86 this puts you
in very
tight spot. But I've sketched some 32-bit PIC code already [as
previously
mentioned "I might have an opportunity to play with AES some day *this
Thank you
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Andy Polyakov via RT
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 9:53 AM
To: Seeda, Srinivas
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #986] Issue while installing openssl
> Can you send me t
... Which leaves the question about why
RC4_INT code was performing so poorly on P4 opened...
yeah i was meaning to go back and re-evaluate the RC4_INT case -- there's
one thing i know really specific to rc4 which isn't a factor in AES:
aliasing. iirc the rc4 loop has two table lookups and one
This issue has been dealt with. Ticket resolved.
--
Richard Levitte
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.
> Can you send me the URL to download the 0.9.7 snapshots. Also please
> let me know the steps to install it.
ftp://ftp.openssl.org/snapshot/openssl-0.9.7-stable... Very same
installation procedure applies to snapshot as it is on release tar-ball. A.
___
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004, Andy Polyakov wrote:
> > > aes-586.pl module is committed to CVS now [see
> > > http://cvs.openssl.org/rlog?f=openssl/crypto/aes/asm/aes-586.pl]. Take
> > > "Special note about instruction choice" in commentary section for
> > > consideration even for AMD64. Merry Christmas to
> Hey, if you don't have a clue, just say so.
That was I tried to say.
> I am the sys admin. Talking to
> myself isn't really helpful. I worked around this problem long ago...
So share it! I bet we can also learn from it...
> The
> original post to your (quite less than helpful) listserv was S
aes-586.pl module is committed to CVS now [see
http://cvs.openssl.org/rlog?f=openssl/crypto/aes/asm/aes-586.pl]. Take
"Special note about instruction choice" in commentary section for
consideration even for AMD64. Merry Christmas to everybody:-) A.
hmmm... i seem to have done better by switching ba
10 matches
Mail list logo