Getting 'no shared ciphers' while connecting to the server

Hi All, I'm using Apache 1.3.31 with mod_ssl 2.8.17 and OpenSSL 0.9.7d binaries. I use RSA based self signed certificates for SSL communication. My httpd.conf has the following SSLCipherSuite configured SSLSessionCacheTimeout 600 SSLOptions +StdEnvVars +ExportCertData SSLCipherSuite ALL:!ADH:!E

RE: When do we stop supporting old platforms?

>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tim Rice >Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 10:19 PM >To: openssl-dev@openssl.org >Subject: When do we stop supporting old platforms? > > > >I notice my OpenServer 3 box will not compile the 0.9.8 betas. >... >[EMA

When do we stop supporting old platforms?

I notice my OpenServer 3 box will not compile the 0.9.8 betas. ... [EMAIL PROTECTED] 13% make making all in crypto... sh[2]: 13003 Memory fault(coredump) *** Error code 1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 14% gmake making all in crypto... gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/libs/openssl-0.9.8/crypto' (

gcc performance regression on md2 from gcc-2.95.3?

I'm looking into http://gcc.gnu.org/PR19923 which claims that gcc-4.0 is slower on 'openssl speed' than earlier versions. The only huge regression seems to be in md2. Has anyone else looked at this yet? I imagine it's a gcc problem, but I thought I'd ask here just in case. OpenSSL 0.9.7e 25 Oct

Undefined symbol OPENSSL_ia32cap_P

OpenSSL_0_9_8-stable branch pulled Mon May 30 19:47:25 PDT 2005. On my unixware-7 boxes configured with the shared & no-sse2 options i'm getting this error. LIBDEPS=" $LIBRARIES -lsocket -lnsl" \ link_app.${shlib_target} Undefined first

Re: SHA512

On Sat, 21 May 2005, Tim Rice wrote: It looks like SHA512 requires a 64bit data type. So on older platforms that do not have long long support, you get errors like making all in crypto/sha... gmake[2]: Entering directory `/var/local/src/libs/openssl-0.9.8/crypto/sha' cc -I.. -I../.. -I../.

[ANNOUNCE] OpenSSL 0.9.8 beta 3 released

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 OpenSSL version 0.9.8 Beta 3 OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS http://www.openssl.org/ OpenSSL is currently in a release cycle. The third beta is now released. The beta release is available for

Re: openssl 0.9.8-beta2 for x64 successfully compiled statically but problems with DLLs

However during compilation I get warning about size_t to int and long conversations: possible loss of data. This is because size_t and even SOCKET is 64 bit wide in this environment. Should I care about this? Not about SOCKET, because even though it's declared a pointer-type, it's safe to cas

openssl 0.9.8-beta2 for x64 successfully compiled statically but problems with DLLs

Hi! I have successfully compiled OpenSSL 0.9.8-beta2 using the new platform SDK which includes 64 bit compiler for AMD 64 and EM64T processors on windows x64. After the compile the tests are successful and even my 64 bit applications worked properly and fast :)) (Of course I had to use do_ms

Re: Problems with engines in 0.9.8-beta1

On May 29 15:35, Geoff Thorpe wrote: > Corinna, Richard, > > I've commited changes to HEAD and the 0.9.8-stable branches, please let me > know if you see any problems. I tried CVS HEAD and this looks good to me, as far as I can test it. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Project Co-L

help

How can I submit a potential bug in SSLeay32.dll and/or libeay32.dll.   Thank you.