On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 09:00:04PM +0100, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> As has happened previously the functionality in the HEAD is not set in stone
> and may be subject to change.
>
> I'm aware of the 0.9.9 TLS extension efforts but I'm not currently actively
> involved with them. I have a shed lo
> BTW why will I run into trouble at 2015 it should be good up to 2037?
> Am I missing some thing?
You said your system signs certificates that are valid for as long as 25
years. In 2015, therefore, you may encounter certificates that expire in
2040.
DS
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 06:05:51PM +0100, Gabriel Forté wrote:
> > but looking at the code again I think it really should be
> > "if (data->state != BIO_CONN_S_OK)" as conn_state() does nothing
> > if the BIO is already in the BIO_CONN_S_OK state.
huh-oh! I just realized I misread that and came to
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 09:49:26AM +0100, Nils Larsch wrote:
> >This is chnaging the beahavior of static long conn_ctrl(BIO *b, int cmd,
> >long num, void
> >*ptr) function.
> >I think it is a typo (just like some other epople using openssl).
> >Nils, could you please confirm me that, or explain
Frédéric Donnat wrote:
Hi all,
I 've already seen some mail about this commit.
http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=13190
It sounds to me like a typo, but ...
- Comment is "add missing parentheses"
- diff is as follow
- if (!data->state != BIO_CONN_S_OK)
+ if (!(data
