Re: Weird OpenSSL behaviour on connecting to W2k3-LDAPS [LONG]

2007-03-04 Thread Christian Marg
Christophe Devine wrote: Christian Marg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: See the log on http://pastebin.com/892617 (or if that takes to long to load: http://pastebin.ca/379610 ) - didn't want to post 30K mail ;) Looking at the logs, it appears the server drops the connection after the client has

Re: [patch] Valgrind complaining about unitialized data

2007-03-04 Thread Lutz Jaenicke
Ben Laurie schrieb: Lutz Jaenicke wrote: Lutz Jaenicke wrote: Peter Waltenberg wrote: Yes, it's desirable that that data is unknown however there is a compromise possible: Complement the area. It'll mean valgrind will only complain at the correct place, or possibly not

Why not send initial Handshake messages wrapped in TLSCompressed and TLSCiphertext

2007-03-04 Thread Anil Mamede
Hi. I'm developing an TLS implementation for Common Lisp. I'm using openssl s_server and s_client for tests propose. Why initial Handshake messages are sent only in TLSPlaintext and not TLSCompressed and TLSCiphertext? Where is written on protocol RFC that the initial handshake messages are

Re: Why not send initial Handshake message s w Why not send initial Handshake messages wrapped� �in TLSCompressedand TLSCiphertext

2007-03-04 Thread badra
Hi. I'm developing an TLS implementation for Common Lisp. I'm using openssl s_server and s_client for tests propose. Why initial Handshake messages are sent only in TLSPlaintext and not TLSCompressed and TLSCiphertext? Because all security parameters are negotiated during this phase. So

RE: [patch] Valgrind complaining about unitialized data

2007-03-04 Thread David Schwartz
Oi. Don't do that. Why not? Because it's a pure pessimization whose sole purpose is to suppress a bogus warnings that very, very few people even see, when there's already a way to suppress those warnings that doesn't impose costs on people who don't care about them because they'll

RE: [patch] Valgrind complaining about unitialized data

2007-03-04 Thread Peter Waltenberg
Yes but: If you use Purify you have to recompile anyway to instrument the code. Valgrind runs on unmodified binaries - and it's not always possible to get someone else to recompile their code so that you can find problems. OpenSSL is used in commercial products where source isn't always

RE: [patch] Valgrind complaining about unitialized data

2007-03-04 Thread David Schwartz
Valgrind runs on unmodified binaries - and it's not always possible to get someone else to recompile their code so that you can find problems. OpenSSL is used in commercial products where source isn't always available. Valgrind *can* run on unmodified binaries, but when you do that, you get

Re: [patch] Valgrind complaining about unitialized data

2007-03-04 Thread Darryl Miles
Peter Waltenberg wrote: Valgrind runs on unmodified binaries - and it's not always possible to get someone else to recompile their code so that you can find problems. OpenSSL is used in commercial products where source isn't always available. This does not mean the valgrind ready version

Re: [patch] Valgrind complaining about unitialized data

2007-03-04 Thread Peter Waltenberg
If you want to debug with OpenSSL you must compile a debugging version, if you want to profile with OpenSSL you must compile a profiling version, if you want to use valgrind with OpenSSL you must compile a valgrind version, yadda, yadda. Which is fine - IF you have access to the sources of