[openssl.org #521] [PATCH] Avoid uninitialized data in random buffer

2007-09-20 Thread Lutz Jaenicke via RT
A respective compile time macro PEDANTIC (to be added to the C flags as -DPEDANTIC) has been added for OpenSSL 0.9.8f. The behavior has been clarified in the manual page and the FAQ __ OpenSSL Project

Cloning of EVP_CIPHER_CTX object

2007-09-20 Thread durgaprasad jammula
Hi All, Is there any way to clone EVP_CIPHER_CTX similar to EVP_MD_CTX_copy is to clone EVP_MD_CTX object? My use case: 1. I have many input texts which start with same 1 MB data. They differ in latter parts. 2. After encrypting first 1 MB data, I want to create a clone of

Certificate Verification

2007-09-20 Thread heladly
Hi, I am trying to perform certification verification for a self-signed CA certificate as well as another certificate signed by this CA. The problem is that the verification always fails. Here is what I do: /* Convert the DER encoded certificate into an X509 structure used by SSL. */

Re: Certificate Verification

2007-09-20 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am trying to perform certification verification for a self-signed CA certificate as well as another certificate signed by this CA. The problem is that the verification always fails. Here is what I do: /* Convert the DER encoded

0.9.8e: SIGILL in test tx509 (I have read the FAQ)

2007-09-20 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hello, I'm running make test on openssl-0.9.8e built under linux and getting an illegal instruction in the tx509 test, both with and without the no-sse2 build option: $ bash -x ./tx509 + cmd='../util/shlib_wrap.sh ../apps/openssl x509' + '[' x '!=' x ']' + t=testx509.pem + echo testing X509

Re: 0.9.8e: SIGILL in test tx509 (I have read the FAQ)

2007-09-20 Thread Bruce Stephens
Andreas Hasenack [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] Any hints? gcc-4.2? If so, try gcc-4.1 if you can, otherwise try disabling all the asm stuff. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org

Re: 0.9.8e: SIGILL in test tx509 (I have read the FAQ)

2007-09-20 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Em Qui, 2007-09-20 às 19:45 +0100, Bruce Stephens escreveu: Andreas Hasenack [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] Any hints? gcc-4.2? If so, try gcc-4.1 if you can, otherwise try disabling all the asm stuff. 4.2, yes, and even a prerelease it seems: 4.2.2 20070909 (prerelease) I'll try

Re: 0.9.8e: SIGILL in test tx509 (I have read the FAQ)

2007-09-20 Thread Andy Polyakov
[...] Any hints? gcc-4.2? If so, try gcc-4.1 if you can, otherwise try disabling all the asm stuff. Could you [instead] try latest 0.9.8 snapshot from ftp://ftp.openssl.org/snapshot/? a. __ OpenSSL Project

Re: 0.9.8e: SIGILL in test tx509 (I have read the FAQ)

2007-09-20 Thread Andreas Hasenack
-0.9.8-stable-SNAP-20070920.tar.gz and my gcc (4.2). __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager

Re: 0.9.8e: SIGILL in test tx509 (I have read the FAQ)

2007-09-20 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Em Qui, 2007-09-20 às 19:45 +0100, Bruce Stephens escreveu: Andreas Hasenack [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] Any hints? gcc-4.2? If so, try gcc-4.1 if you can, otherwise try disabling all the asm stuff. Disabling asm (i.e., adding no-asm to Configure line) didn't help. I don't have

Re: 0.9.8e: SIGILL in test tx509 (I have read the FAQ)

2007-09-20 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007, Andreas Hasenack wrote: Em Qui, 2007-09-20 às 19:45 +0100, Bruce Stephens escreveu: Andreas Hasenack [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] Any hints? gcc-4.2? If so, try gcc-4.1 if you can, otherwise try disabling all the asm stuff. Disabling asm (i.e.,

Re: 0.9.8e: SIGILL in test tx509 (I have read the FAQ)

2007-09-20 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Em Qui, 2007-09-20 às 22:50 +0200, Dr. Stephen Henson escreveu: On Thu, Sep 20, 2007, Andreas Hasenack wrote: Em Qui, 2007-09-20 Юs 19:45 +0100, Bruce Stephens escreveu: Andreas Hasenack [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] Any hints? gcc-4.2? If so, try gcc-4.1 if you