Re: Re: [openssl.org #1521] bug report

2007-11-29 Thread Dmitri Dmitrienko
Did your problem got resolved? If yes please let me know the solution for it. Not yet. For x86_64 I still link my library with 0.9.7 but didn't try the latest snapshot. I'll give it a try soon and we'll see if anything has changed since my last attempt. BTW, you can try to configure without

Re: Re: [openssl.org #1521] bug report

2007-11-29 Thread chandok . r
Hello Andy, Thanks for the feedback on the issue. I am also facing the same issue with openssl 0.9.8 with x86_64 Linux. And the issue is only specific to x86_64 as i am using the lib for different platform and they are compiling fine. It all worked fine with openssl 0.9.7 under the same

[PATCH] Using uninitialized value (c).q

2007-11-29 Thread Dequin_Eric
Hi team, I suggest updating the file crypto/asn1/a_set.c, as follows: 219c219 asn1_add_error(*pp,(int)(c.q- *pp)); --- asn1_add_error(*pp,(int)(c.p - *pp)); The function asn1_add_error() receives in its second argument the c.q variable.

Re: OpenSSL FIPS Object Module v1.2

2007-11-29 Thread Kyle Hamilton
The FIPS validation process is... odd. And not at all conducive to the open-source development model. There is no available OpenSSL FIPS Object Module v1.2. Until it passes validation, anyway, at which point the openssl-fips-1.2.0.tar.gz file will be made available. I don't think the source is

Re: OpenSSL FIPS Object Module v1.2

2007-11-29 Thread Kyle Hamilton
Ideally (in my view anyway), we'd have some sort of announcement as to where the FIPS code is being evaluated, then have a couple of weeks to a month to hammer at it before it's sent off to the (much more costly, and much more involved) CMVP validation. We've seen through 2 iterations of the

Re: OpenSSL FIPS Object Module v1.2

2007-11-29 Thread Steve Marquess
Kyle Hamilton wrote: The FIPS validation process is... odd. And not at all conducive to the open-source development model. There is a certain dissonance, for sure :-) There is no available OpenSSL FIPS Object Module v1.2. Well, yes and no. Check out the OpenSSL-fips-0_9_8-stable branch.

Re: OpenSSL FIPS Object Module v1.2

2007-11-29 Thread Brad House
Ideally (in my view anyway), we'd have some sort of announcement as to where the FIPS code is being evaluated, then have a couple of weeks to a month to hammer at it before it's sent off to the (much more costly, and much more involved) CMVP validation. I like the idea of a peer review

Re: OpenSSL FIPS Object Module v1.2

2007-11-29 Thread Peter Waltenberg
and I'm sure I forgot something there. HP/UX Itanium, Solaris X86/X86_64. Linux PPC, PPC64 , zSeries 31 and 64 bit ... I could find time and machines to test a few of the platforms as well if it'll help weed out build issues. We also have code to test against the sample NIST test vectors, that's