On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:01:41 -0800 (PST) Al shase...@yahoo.com wrote:
is the date format correct then? the x509 doesnt seem to give me the
exact format for datesetting and i used YYMMDDHHMMSSZ. I tried other
formats but all no good. How did you set yours?
man 1 x509
-startdate
Probably not intended, at least behavior of current 0.9.8-stable CVS
is
different now. See my mail with quite similar question:
http://marc.info/?l=openssl-devm=125792743829558w=2
Thanks Tomas, interesting post... I have tested various builds against
the client renegotiation vulnerability
Here's a fix for bug 2095:
--- openssl-1.0.0-beta4/crypto/sha/asm/sha1-x86_64.pl.ark 2009-11-12
11:49:14.050385007 +
+++ openssl-1.0.0-beta4/crypto/sha/asm/sha1-x86_64.pl 2009-11-12
11:57:00.589494831 +
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ ___
sub BODY_20_39 {
my ($i,$a,$b,$c,$d,$e,$f)=...@_;
Hi Steve!
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:08:36 +0100 Dr. Stephen Henson
st...@openssl.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009, Tomas Hoger wrote:
This is unclear, they are banned in 0.9.8-stable, but 1.0.0beta4
seems to allow all, even those without an extension.
Sorry about that, the port I did to
Boyle Owen wrote:
PPS: Although I have subscribed to this list, I am not getting the mails
(I have to keep checking the archives). Is there anyone who can check
out my account?
Hmm. If memory serves me right there was a subscribe message sent to
the list instead of the mailing list
I just committed the suggested changes. I try to find the time
checking the problems with the tests within the next few days.
Cheers,
Richard
In message 0915433492_20202...@antinode.info on Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:43:34
-0600 (CST), Steven M. Schweda s...@antinode.info said:
sms From:
Hello,
I have already made the correction off all remaining issues... 32/64 bit
pointer size handling.
I still have some minor issues around tests.com... but in about an hour
I will be able to submit a patch.
Regards,
Z
-Original Message-
From: Richard Levitte
==by 0x4026A4: d2i_PublicKey
==22183==by 0x401A90: main
==22183==
==22183== LEAK SUMMARY:
==22183==definitely lost: 168 bytes in 1 blocks
openssl-1.0.0-stable-SNAP-20091112 (OpenSSL 1.0.0-beta4 10 Nov 2009) :
Return 0, and memory leak:
==31472== 296 (168 direct, 128 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks
Hello all,
OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta 4 fails to compile on Borland (C++ Builder 2006) due to
some missing definitions in e_os.h. The patch below fixes the problem with
no apparent side-effects.
It appears to be no longer possible to use assembler code with Borland as
the linker fails when reading NASM
In message 09111210562552_20202...@antinode.info on Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:56:25
-0600 (CST), Steven M. Schweda s...@antinode.info said:
sms From: Dr. Stephen Henson st...@openssl.org
sms
sms Can you (and others in this thread) please submit bug fix patches to the
sms request tracker
In message 839c820b5c926b4b89713b3a6ed68d2aae5...@sgstmail.scigames.at on
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:26:57 +0100, Arpadffy Zoltan
zoltan.arpad...@scientificgames.se said:
Zoltan.Arpadffy The only extra improvement is that I used the unused
Zoltan.Arpadffy second variable to configure the pointer size
From: Richard Levitte rich...@levitte.org
smsAdded an SSL_ prefix to the object library names so that a
sms victim might have some chance of identifying the things amid the
sms clutter in SYS$SHARE:
Most victims have read some documentation and therefore know what the
library names
Hi ALL ,
I tried to build openssl-1.0.0-beta4 version of Openssl for AIX . I am
getting error while building .
I have followed the following step.
1. ./Configure -DSSL_ALLOW_ADH --prefix=/usr --openssldir=/var/ssl
no-idea no-rc5 no-ec no-symlinks shared threads aix-cc
Configuring for
13 matches
Mail list logo
