Re: [openssl.org #2053] [PATCH] Add new -ext_print option to x509 app to print certificate extensions

2010-01-18 Thread Walter Goulet via RT
Hi, I never got a reply but was wondering if my patch below was accepted. I didn't see any further discussion on the mail list archives other than 1 reply and that reply was for a suggested change in the option's name. Thanks, Walter On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Walter Goulet wrote: > if

Question on fips_canister.c

2010-01-18 Thread Roger No-Spam
Hello, I'm currently porting the openssl-0.9.8 fips code to a proprietary platform. There seems to quite a lot of time and effort put into all the macros for different OSs and CPUs in FIPS_ref_point() and instruction_pointer(). But I fail to see what problem the code in fips_canister.c is trying

Re: [openssl.org #2095] BUG: sha1-x86_64: out range of signed 32bit displacement

2010-01-18 Thread Andy Polyakov
> Here's a fix for bug 2095: > Applied to 1.0.0, thanks for the report. Not applied to HEAD as patch doesn't apply cleanly, can you check HEAD too? >>> Still not fixed... >>> >> Not fixed in what? > > Whatever it is in > rsync://dev.openssl.org/openssl-cvs/ > > $ cvs diff crypto

[openssl.org #2145] [PATCH] New parameter "signing_digest" for TS module

2010-01-18 Thread Jaroslav Imrich via RT
Hello, I am attaching patch that introduces new parameter "signing_digest" to the TSA section of OpenSSL configuration file. This parameter allows user to set digest algorithm used for TS response signing. Instead of previous default signature SHA1withRSA it is now possible to create TS responses

Re: [openssl.org #2095] BUG: sha1-x86_64: out range of signed 32bit displacement

2010-01-18 Thread Sami Farin
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 14:32:32 +0100, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2010, Sami Farin wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 15:27:51 +0100, Stephen Henson via RT wrote: > > > > [...@blankpage.ch - Thu Nov 12 13:39:01 2009]: > > > > > > > > Here's a fix for bug 2095: > > > > > > >