I've noticed when calling PEM_read_bio_X509() on a bogus file it has to read
*the entire file* before it fails and returns NULL, whereas other functions
like d2i_PKCS7_bio and d2i_PKCS12_bio() fail after reading just a small
amount.
Can we fix the PEM functions to fail sooner? Why can't they tell
Hi All,
I wanted to know when we use "ALL:!SSLv2:!EXPORT:!LOW:!MEDIUM:!DH" to select
the ciphers how do OpenSSL understands what are ciphers are available under
LOW and MEDIUM. Ssleay.txt documents names LOW,MEDIUM and HIGH as aliases.
Please can someone provide me more information on this?
Thank
> If there are any minor issues which someone VMS illiterate (i.e. me) can
> understand I'll fix them.
By the way, speaking of non-VMS stuff, in case anyone cares, ...
dyi # uname -a
HP-UX dyi B.11.31 U ia64 4235313755 unlimited-user license
dyi # gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 4.3.3
[...]
[...]
gc
t that
using the old, sequestered [] tree made sense, and had the
advantage of making clean-up simpler. This change, by the way is what
hosed the installation procedure ([.crypto]install.com), which wasn't
notified of the change:
[...]
Installing CRYPTO files.
[...]
%COPY-E-OPENIN,
According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any
further questions or concerns, please respond to this message.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing
> [seggelm...@fh-muenster.de - Wed Apr 14 18:03:15 2010]:
>
> Yes, but the dtls1_buffer_message() function uses a PQ_64BIT pointer
>to pass a PQ_64BIT struct, which is accessed directly. However,
>passed is just the pointer to the array which holds the sequence
>number. This is not ver
On 14.04.2010, at 15:35, Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
>> [seggelm...@fh-muenster.de - Wed Apr 14 12:08:30 2010]:
>>
>> In my opinion the patch is also not necessary, because
>> dtls1_buffer_message() requires a pointer to some 64 bit data to be
>> used as the priority for the queue. However,
I think, it could be a bug, not yet noted by others because never used
num_read.
Regards,
M.M.
Ray Satiro schrieb:
> Both BIO_write() and BIO_puts() increment num_write on success. But
> BIO_gets() by all appearances does not increment num_read, only
> BIO_read() does. I don't see why that omissio
> [seggelm...@fh-muenster.de - Wed Apr 14 12:08:30 2010]:
>
> In my opinion the patch is also not necessary, because
>dtls1_buffer_message() requires a pointer to some 64 bit data to be
>used as the priority for the queue. However, s->s3->rrec.seq_num
>already is a pointer, since it is
On Apr 14, 2010, at 2:20 PM, Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
> This patch appears to be broken on OpenSSL 0.9.8 it gives warnings:
>
> d1_both.c: In function ‘dtls1_reassemble_fragment’:
> d1_both.c:623: error: passing argument 2 of ‘pqueue_find’ makes integer
> from pointer without a cast
> ../incl
This patch appears to be broken on OpenSSL 0.9.8 it gives warnings:
d1_both.c: In function ‘dtls1_reassemble_fragment’:
d1_both.c:623: error: passing argument 2 of ‘pqueue_find’ makes integer
from pointer without a cast
../include/openssl/pqueue.h:89: note: expected ‘long unsigned int’ but
argumen
In my opinion the patch is also not necessary, because dtls1_buffer_message()
requires a pointer to some 64 bit data to be used as the priority for the
queue. However, s->s3->rrec.seq_num already is a pointer, since it is an array.
Using &(s->s3->rrec.seq_num) usually returns the same value, i.e
Hello,
I have checked both the 1.0.0 and 0.9.8 20100414 snapshots and it look
much-much better.
Thank you very much Richard and Steven.
I got almost clean compile in both branches
On OPENSSL-098-STABLE-SNAP-20100414 got the following informational message and
a warning.
bss_dgram.c
Where can I get program example using ENGINE as STORE?
Valery Blazhnov
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated Lis
Greetings,
I have identified several problems in the way OpenSSL 1.0.0's c_rehash works.
This breaks on any nonstandard configuration, in that:
- c_rehash POSTFIXES $dir/bin to the PATH, when it should prefix it. ($dir
inherits $openssldir from Configure)
- c_rehash should use $prefix/bin, not
15 matches
Mail list logo
