Greetings,
I have identified several problems in the way OpenSSL 1.0.0's c_rehash works.
This breaks on any nonstandard configuration, in that:
- c_rehash POSTFIXES $dir/bin to the PATH, when it should prefix it. ($dir
inherits $openssldir from Configure)
- c_rehash should use $prefix/bin, not
Where can I get program example using ENGINE as STORE?
Valery Blazhnov
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated
Hello,
I have checked both the 1.0.0 and 0.9.8 20100414 snapshots and it look
much-much better.
Thank you very much Richard and Steven.
I got almost clean compile in both branches
On OPENSSL-098-STABLE-SNAP-20100414 got the following informational message and
a warning.
bss_dgram.c
In my opinion the patch is also not necessary, because dtls1_buffer_message()
requires a pointer to some 64 bit data to be used as the priority for the
queue. However, s-s3-rrec.seq_num already is a pointer, since it is an array.
Using (s-s3-rrec.seq_num) usually returns the same value, i.e.
This patch appears to be broken on OpenSSL 0.9.8 it gives warnings:
d1_both.c: In function ‘dtls1_reassemble_fragment’:
d1_both.c:623: error: passing argument 2 of ‘pqueue_find’ makes integer
from pointer without a cast
../include/openssl/pqueue.h:89: note: expected ‘long unsigned int’ but
On Apr 14, 2010, at 2:20 PM, Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
This patch appears to be broken on OpenSSL 0.9.8 it gives warnings:
d1_both.c: In function ‘dtls1_reassemble_fragment’:
d1_both.c:623: error: passing argument 2 of ‘pqueue_find’ makes integer
from pointer without a cast
[seggelm...@fh-muenster.de - Wed Apr 14 12:08:30 2010]:
In my opinion the patch is also not necessary, because
dtls1_buffer_message() requires a pointer to some 64 bit data to be
used as the priority for the queue. However, s-s3-rrec.seq_num
already is a pointer, since it is an
I think, it could be a bug, not yet noted by others because never used
num_read.
Regards,
M.M.
Ray Satiro schrieb:
Both BIO_write() and BIO_puts() increment num_write on success. But
BIO_gets() by all appearances does not increment num_read, only
BIO_read() does. I don't see why that omission
On 14.04.2010, at 15:35, Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
[seggelm...@fh-muenster.de - Wed Apr 14 12:08:30 2010]:
In my opinion the patch is also not necessary, because
dtls1_buffer_message() requires a pointer to some 64 bit data to be
used as the priority for the queue. However,
[seggelm...@fh-muenster.de - Wed Apr 14 18:03:15 2010]:
Yes, but the dtls1_buffer_message() function uses a PQ_64BIT pointer
to pass a PQ_64BIT struct, which is accessed directly. However,
passed is just the pointer to the array which holds the sequence
number. This is not very
According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any
further questions or concerns, please respond to this message.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing
-SNAP-20100414.ALPHA.CRYPTO]OPENSSLCONF.H; as input
-RMS-E-DNF, directory not found
-SYSTEM-W-NOSUCHFILE, no such file
[...]
(Oh, _now_ I see. This (annoying) change would allow the deletion of a
few lines of DCL in [.crypto]install.com. But they weren't deleted.)
--- crypto/install.com_orig
If there are any minor issues which someone VMS illiterate (i.e. me) can
understand I'll fix them.
By the way, speaking of non-VMS stuff, in case anyone cares, ...
dyi # uname -a
HP-UX dyi B.11.31 U ia64 4235313755 unlimited-user license
dyi # gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 4.3.3
[...]
[...]
gcc
Hi All,
I wanted to know when we use ALL:!SSLv2:!EXPORT:!LOW:!MEDIUM:!DH to select
the ciphers how do OpenSSL understands what are ciphers are available under
LOW and MEDIUM. Ssleay.txt documents names LOW,MEDIUM and HIGH as aliases.
Please can someone provide me more information on this?
Thanks
I've noticed when calling PEM_read_bio_X509() on a bogus file it has to read
*the entire file* before it fails and returns NULL, whereas other functions
like d2i_PKCS7_bio and d2i_PKCS12_bio() fail after reading just a small
amount.
Can we fix the PEM functions to fail sooner? Why can't they
15 matches
Mail list logo