M.-A. Lemburg via RT wrote:
> An application that only includes openssl/ssl.h from OpenSSL
> 1.0.0 and doesn't use winsock.h will run into problems on Windows,
> since the dtls1.h header file includes the winsock.h header file long
> after the ossl_typ.h header file was loaded.
What about to defin
M.-A. Lemburg via RT wrote:
An application that only includes openssl/ssl.h from OpenSSL
1.0.0 and doesn't use winsock.h will run into problems on Windows,
since the dtls1.h header file includes the winsock.h header file long
after the ossl_typ.h header file was loaded.
What about to define WIN
Hello,
As previously noted on this mailing list, the AES performance (without
AES-NI) of v1.0.o on Intel Westmere chips seems a bit slow. In addition,
RC4 seems a bit slow compared to previous Intel chips.
I've included below the speed output for several versions of OpenSSL for
comparison. For si
On 4/26/2010 1:18 PM, Mounir IDRASSI via RT wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch adds the /Zi switch to CFLAG in the debug configuration in
> order to permit stepping inside OpenSSL code during debug sessions.
> It applied to the latest snapshots of 1.0.0 and 0.9.8 source trees.
It should be in base_cfla
On 4/26/2010 1:18 PM, Mounir IDRASSI via RT wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch adds the /Zi switch to CFLAG in the debug configuration in
> order to permit stepping inside OpenSSL code during debug sessions.
> It applied to the latest snapshots of 1.0.0 and 0.9.8 source trees.
It should be in base_cfla
An application that only includes openssl/ssl.h from OpenSSL
1.0.0 and doesn't use winsock.h will run into problems on Windows,
since the dtls1.h header file includes the winsock.h header file long
after the ossl_typ.h header file was loaded.
The latter includes a couple of #undefs needed to work
Hi,
This patch adds the /Zi switch to CFLAG in the debug configuration in
order to permit stepping inside OpenSSL code during debug sessions.
It applied to the latest snapshots of 1.0.0 and 0.9.8 source trees.
--
Mounir IDRASSI
IDRIX
http://www.idrix.fr
--- H:/Dev/libraries/openssl-stable-20100
From: "Jouk Jansen"
> Parse Style: Extended
>
> Case Lookup: Blind
>
> So I assumed it was because of the extended parse style.
Never assume. ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desk_Set Everyone
needs to see this movie.)
My next guess would be that you have some CRTL feature logical
name(
On Apr 26, 2010, at 12:44 PM, Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
>> [seggelm...@fh-muenster.de - Mon Apr 26 11:04:29 2010]:
>>
>>
>> You're right. The loop was written in the assumption that the control
>> variable in the for loop can become -1. Since the variable type was
>> changed to unsigned
> [seggelm...@fh-muenster.de - Mon Apr 26 11:04:29 2010]:
>
>
> You're right. The loop was written in the assumption that the control
>variable in the for loop can become -1. Since the variable type was
>changed to unsigned long, that didn't work anymore and my fix also
>didn't correc
On Apr 24, 2010, at 6:36 PM, Daniel Mentz via RT wrote:
> Robin Seggelmann via RT wrote:
>> #define RSMBLY_BITMASK_IS_COMPLETE(bitmask, msg_len, is_complete) { \
>
>> +if (is_complete) for (ii = (((msg_len) - 1) >> 3) - 1;
>> ii > 0 ; ii--) \
>
> I'm wondering if there are
11 matches
Mail list logo
