Hi,
openssl 0.9.8m was fine, but with 1.0.0 I get:
sha256-sparcv9.s: Assembler messages:
sha256-sparcv9.s:1849: Error: unaligned opcodes detected in executable
segment
I look around and noticed
http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=2190user=guestpass=guest
subsequently I came up with
Please let me know if anyone has faced similar issue. Details of the issue are
mentioned in the mail thread...
-Regards
Basi Reddy M
-Original Message-
From: owner-openssl-...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-...@openssl.org] On
Behalf Of Basireddy M
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010
Hi,
Since the inclusion of sparcv9a-mont.s/.pl, I get a SIGBUS error when
running bntest. Package is openssl 1.0.0 with sparcv9a on Linux 2.6.34
with a sparcv9 environment (64-bit kernel, 32-bit userspace/v8/v8plus)
on a sun4v US T1 CPU. I am aware of the FPU implications - openssl just
Since the inclusion of sparcv9a-mont.s/.pl, I get a SIGBUS error when
running bntest. Package is openssl 1.0.0 with sparcv9a on Linux 2.6.34
with a sparcv9 environment (64-bit kernel, 32-bit userspace/v8/v8plus)
on a sun4v US T1 CPU. I am aware of the FPU implications - openssl just
chooses
misuse of rdtsc and registers in embedded assembly language
openSSL 1.0,0, last modified on 29 March 2010
Spotted in the function RAND_poll() in rand_nw.c
The size of the variable tsc used in a asm parameter (unsigned long) is not
compatible with the edx:eax registers as modified by the
Mohan, Dharmendra wrote:
Hi,
Each openssl version in (0.9.8x) has a fips directory. There is also a
openssl object module that is FIPS certified. Is the fips code in
openssl versions the updated code of the openssl object module – with
bug fixes, enhancements etc.
Thanks,
-Dharmendra
